Cited by 23Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsProtein Structure and DynamicsCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Homology modeling of tubulin: Influence predictions for microtubule’s biophysical properties

Carpenter, Eric J., Huzil, J. Torin, Ludueña, Richard F., Tuszynski, Jack A.·2006·European Biophysics Journal

Abstract

Using comparative modeling, we have generated structural models of 475 alpha and beta tubulins. Using these models, we observed a global, structural similarity between the tubulin isotypes. However, a number of subtle differences in the isotypes physical properties, including net electric charges, solvent accessible surface areas, and electric dipole moments were also apparent. In order to examine the roles that these properties may play in microtubule (MT) assembly and stability, we have created a model to evaluate the dipole-dipole interaction energies of varying MT lattice conformations, using human tubulin isotypes as particularly important examples. We conclude that the dipole moments of each tubulin isotype may influence their functional characteristics within the cell, resulting in differences for MT assembly kinetics and stability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00249-006-0088-0

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dipole moment of tubulin, excluding the C-termini, has been estimated to be between 566 debye for the α-monomer and 1714 for the β-monomer.

    “The dipole moment of tubulin (excluding the very flexible and dynamic C-termini which we discuss separately below) has been estimated to be between 566 debye for the α-monomer and 1714 for the β-monomer [69].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carpenter, E. J., Huzil, J. T., Ludueña, R. F., & Tuszynski, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
European Biophysics Journal
Published
2006-08-29
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
35-43
ISSN
  • 0175-7571 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1017
OpenAlex
W1993028475
Cited by
23
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Biophysics Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA 54174, P30CA054174)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
tubulin, microtubule assembly, microtubule stability, electric dipole moment, dipole-dipole interaction, solvent accessible surface area, comparative protein modeling
MeSH terms
Biophysics, Humans, Ions, Kinetics, Microtubule Proteins, Microtubules, Molecular Conformation, Software, Solvents, Tubulin, Models, Statistical, Databases, Protein, Static Electricity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review