The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in the technology available for culture-independent methods for identification and enumeration of environmental bacteria have invigorated interest in the study of the role of chicken intestinal microbiota in health and productivity. Chickens harbour unique and diverse bacterial communities that include human and animal pathogens. Increasing public concern about the use of antibiotics in the poultry industry has influenced the ways in which poultry producers are working towards improving birds’ intestinal health. Effective means of antibiotic-independent pathogen control through competitive exclusion and promotion of good protective microbiota are being actively investigated. With the realisation that just about any change in environment influences the highly responsive microbial communities and with the abandonment of the notion that we can isolate and investigate a single species of interest outside of the community, came a flood of studies that have attempted to profile the intestinal microbiota of chickens under numerous conditions. This review aims to address the main issues in investigating chicken microbiota and to summarise the data acquired to date.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dethlefsen, L., Huse, S., Sogin, M. L., & Relman, D. A. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060280 · Cited by 2,361
Butyrate and other short-chain fatty acids as modulators of immunity: What relevance for health?
Meijer, K., de Vos, P., & Priebe, M. G. (2010) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0b013e32833eebe5 · Cited by 443
Intestinal microbiota associated with differential feed conversion efficiency in chickens
Stanley, D., Denman, S. E., Hughes, R. J., Geier, M. S., Crowley, T. M., Chen, H., Haring, V. R., & Moore, R. J. (2012) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3847-5 · Cited by 312
Cited by
Durazzi, F., Sala, C., Castellani, G., Manfreda, G., Remondini, D., & De Cesare, A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82726-y · Cited by 594
Prebiotics and gut microbiota in chickens
Pourabedin, M., & Zhao, X. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1093/femsle/fnv122 · Cited by 285
Stanley, D., Hughes, R. J., Geier, M. S., & Moore, R. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00187 · Cited by 283
Self-citationIkeda-Ohtsubo, W., Brugman, S., Warden, C. H., Rebel, J. M. J., Folkerts, G., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2018.00090 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanley, D., Hughes, R. J., & Moore, R. J.
- Venue
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
- Published
- 2014-03-19
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4301-4310
- ISSN
- 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0614
- OpenAlex
- W2041550346
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 44.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00253-014-5646-2
- The paper
- Stanley, D., Hughes, R. J., & Moore, R. J. (2014). Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5646-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.