Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Rectal/Pelvic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations

Open access
Nygren, J., Thacker, J., Carli, F., Fearon, K. C. H., Norderval, S., Lobo, D. N., Ljungqvist, O., Soop, M., Ramirez, J.·2013·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative care in rectal/pelvic surgery, and to provide graded recommendations for items for an evidenced‐based enhanced recovery protocol. Methods: Studies were selected with particular attention paid to meta‐analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohorts. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English‐language literature was examined, reviewed and graded. A consensus recommendation was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group. Results: For most of the protocol items, recommendations are based on good‐quality trials or meta‐analyses of good‐quality trials (evidence grade: high or moderate). Conclusions: Based on the evidence available for each item of the multimodal perioperative care pathway, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) present a comprehensive evidence‐based consensus review of perioperative care for rectal surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 138

  1. 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00131-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.AE · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/s12630‐009‐9159‐x · DOI
  7. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000122046.30687.5C · DOI
  8. 10.1160/ME0406 · doi:10.1160/me0406
  9. 10.1007/s11999‐011‐1951‐6 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/bja/aeq360 · DOI
  11. Haines TP, 2010, Patient education to prevent falls among older hospital inpatients: a randomized controlled trial, Arch Intern Med, 171, 4
  12. 10.1007/s00384‐011‐1252‐2 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3283499ae1 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.015 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/bja/aen401 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/bjs.7102 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.045 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1007/s10350‐004‐0592‐1 · doi:10.1007/s10350-004-0592-1
  19. Guenaga KF, 2011, Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9, CD001544
  20. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fd8ea9 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.bpa.2006.03.002 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1399‐6576.2008.01599.x · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.bpa.2006.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/bjs.1800710828 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/bjs.5919 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1034/j.1399‐6576.2003.00047.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. Awad S, 2012, Preoperative oral carbohydrate loading in elective surgery: a meta‐analysis, BJS, 99
  29. 10.1001/archsurg.2010.309 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.08.007 · DOI
  31. Walker KJ, 2009, Premedication for anxiety in adult day surgery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, CD002192
  32. 10.1093/bja/ael094 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1093/bja/83.4.585 · DOI
  34. Rasmussen MS, 2009, Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 21, CD004318
  35. Amaragiri SV, 2000, Elastic compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, CD001484
  36. 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181eb9b0e · doi:10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181eb9b0e
  37. 10.1086/421095 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Nelson RL, 2009, Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 21, CD001181
  39. 10.1056/NEJMoa054408 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1056/NEJMoa0810988 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Punjasawadwong Y, 2007, Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 17, CD003843
  42. 10.1002/bjs.5825 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1002/bjs.7545 · doi:10.1002/bjs.7545
  44. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.07.011 · DOI
  45. Liu Y, 2012, The efficacy of NMDA receptor antagonists for preventing remifentanil‐induced increase in postoperative pain and analgesic requirement: a meta‐analysis, Minerva Anestesiol, 78, 653
  46. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a51cb0 · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181a51cb0
  47. 10.1016/j.bpa.2010.02.005 · DOI
  48. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181ba7945 · DOI
  49. 10.1056/NEJM200001203420303 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Imberger G, 2010, Positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for the prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8, CD007922
  51. BlixtC AhlstedtC LjungqvistOet al (2012) The effect of perioperative glucose control on postoperative insulin resistance.Clin Nutr. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2012.02.011 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.09.016 · DOI
  53. 10.1210/jc.2010‐0135 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d90087 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/bja/89.3.446 · doi:10.1093/bja/89.3.446
  56. 10.1093/bja/aep279 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31820bfc81 · DOI
  58. 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820307f7 · doi:10.1097/aap.0b013e31820307f7
  59. 10.1016/S0140‐6736(03)14966‐5 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834a4e1e · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.05.018 · DOI
  62. 10.1007/BF02235570 · DOI
  63. 10.1007/s00384‐010‐0898‐5 · doi:10.1007/s00384-010-0898-5
  64. 10.1111/j.1463‐1318.2012.02985.x · DOI
  65. Breukink S, 2006, Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 18, CD005200
  66. 10.1245/s10434‐009‐0603‐5 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/S0140‐6736(05)66545‐2 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1007/s00384‐010‐1091‐6 · DOI
  70. 10.1097/00000658‐199505000‐00004 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Nelson R, 2007, Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 18, CD004929
  72. 10.1067/msy.2001.116029 · doi:10.1067/msy.2001.116029
  73. 10.1007/s00384‐010‐1093‐4 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.09.002 · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2008.09.002
  75. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cb3ebf · DOI
  76. 10.1111/j.1399‐6576.2009.02029.x · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1002/bjs.4223 · DOI
  78. 10.1002/bjs.7127 · doi:10.1002/bjs.7127
  79. 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181b4c35e · DOI
  80. 10.1002/bjs.5454 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1111/j.1365‐2044.2009.05886_1.x · DOI
  82. Jesus E, 2004, Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 18, CD002100
  83. 10.1016/j.anchir.2005.03.007 · doi:10.1016/j.anchir.2005.03.007
  84. 10.1007/DCR.06013e3181c7525c · doi:10.1007/dcr.06013e3181c7525c
  85. 10.1016/S0039‐6060(99)70256‐4 · doi:10.1016/s0039-6060(99)70256-4
  86. 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ae9fac · doi:10.1097/aap.0b013e3181ae9fac
  87. 10.1002/bjs.5424 · DOI
  88. 10.1007/s00268‐009‐0104‐5 · DOI
  89. 10.1046/j.0007‐1323.2001.01916.x · DOI
  90. 10.1006/gyno.1999.5401 · doi:10.1006/gyno.1999.5401
  91. 10.1007/s00384‐008‐0536‐7 · doi:10.1007/s00384-008-0536-7
  92. 10.1002/bjs.7120 · DOI
  93. 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.902 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.902
  94. Werawatganon T, 2005, Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra‐abdominal surgery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 25, CD004088
  95. 10.2165/10898560‐000000000‐00000 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4362 · doi:10.1097/aap.0b013e31820d4362
  97. 10.1097/01.anes.0000278903.91986.19 · doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000278903.91986.19
  98. 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182429531 · DOI · Paper page
  99. Charlton S, 2010, Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8, CD007705
  100. Klein M, 2012, Postoperative non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and colorectal anastomotic leakage. NSAIDs and anastomotic leakage, Dan Med J, 59, B4420
  101. Andersen HK, 2006, Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 18, CD004080
  102. 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819f1416 · DOI
  103. 10.1136/gut.40.3.393 · DOI · Paper page
  104. 10.1002/bjs.4578 · DOI · Paper page
  105. 10.1136/gut.46.6.813 · DOI · Paper page
  106. 10.1042/cs0930137 · DOI
  107. 10.1002/bjs.6724 · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.1056/NEJMoa011300 · DOI · Paper page
  109. 10.1016/S1098-3597(03)90018-4 · DOI
  110. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.05.049 · DOI · Paper page
  111. 10.2337/dc10‐0304 · DOI · Paper page
  112. 10.4065/80.7.862 · DOI · Paper page
  113. 10.1210/jc.2011‐2098 · DOI · Paper page
  114. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.070 · DOI
  115. 10.2337/dc10‐1407 · DOI · Paper page
  116. 10.1016/S0261‐5614(98)80307‐5 · DOI · Paper page
  117. 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.280.4.E576 · DOI · Paper page
  118. 10.1213/00000539-200302000-00047 · DOI
  119. 10.1002/bjs.1800750618 · DOI
  120. Thorell A, 1996, The metabolic response to cholecystectomy: insulin resistance after open compared with laparoscopic operation, Eur J Surg, 162, 187
  121. 10.1002/bjs.4642 · DOI · Paper page
  122. 10.1016/S0002‐9610(02)00866‐8 · DOI · Paper page
  123. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  124. 10.1007/s00423-003-0350-1 · DOI
  125. 10.1002/bjs.5468 · DOI · Paper page
  126. 10.1002/bjs.6445 · DOI · Paper page
  127. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.08.030 · DOI
  128. 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  129. 10.1007/s00384‐010‐1032‐4 · doi:10.1007/s00384-010-1032-4
  130. 10.1007/s00384‐011‐1385‐3 · DOI
  131. 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318216067d · doi:10.1007/dcr.0b013e318216067d
  132. 10.1111/j.1463‐1318.2006.00963.x · DOI
  133. Sammour T, 2010, A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost‐effective intervention in elective colonic surgery, N Z Med J, 123, 61
  134. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821fd1ce · DOI · Paper page
  135. 10.1007/s11136‐006‐0047‐3 · doi:10.1007/s11136-006-0047-3
  136. 10.1111/j.1463‐1318.2006.00995.x · DOI
  137. 10.1016/j.jss.2008.06.023 · DOI
  138. 10.1001/archsurg.2009.170 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 2,171

Metadata

Authors
Nygren, J., Thacker, J., Carli, F., Fearon, K. C. H., Norderval, S., Lobo, D. N., Ljungqvist, O., Soop, M., & Ramirez, J.
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-06
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
285-305
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W1984242781
Cited by
2,171
References
19
FWCI
80.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Funders
European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Rectal/Pelvic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6
The paper
Nygren, J., Thacker, J., Carli, F., Fearon, K. C. H., Norderval, S., Lobo, D. N., Ljungqvist, O., Soop, M., & Ramirez, J. (2013). Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Rectal/Pelvic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.