Cited by 77Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAortic Thrombus and EmbolismVascular anomalies and interventions

Endovascular Therapy as a Primary Revascularization Modality in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia

Kärkkäinen, Jussi M., Lehtimäki, Tiina T., Saari, Petri, Hartikainen, Juha, Rantanen, Tuomo, Paajanen, Hannu, Manninen, Hannu·2015·CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate endovascular therapy (EVT) as the primary revascularization method for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). Methods A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive patients treated for AMI during a 5-year period (January 2009 to December 2013). EVT was attempted in all patients referred for emergent revascularization. Surgical revascularization was performed selectively after failure of EVT. Patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes were studied. Failures and complications of EVT were recorded. Results Fifty patients, aged 79 ± 9 years (mean ± SD), out of 66 consecutive patients with AMI secondary to embolic or thrombotic obstruction of the superior mesenteric artery were referred for revascularization. The etiology of AMI was embolism in 18 (36 %) and thrombosis in 32 (64 %) patients. EVT was technically successful in 44 (88 %) patients. Mortality after successful or failed EVT was 32 %. The rates of emergency laparotomy, bowel resection, and EVT-related complication were 40, 34, and 10 %, respectively. Three out of six patients with failure of EVT were treated with surgical bypass. EVT failure did not significantly affect survival. Conclusions EVT is feasible in most cases of AMI, with favorable patient outcome and acceptable complication rate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00270-015-1064-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kärkkäinen, J. M., Lehtimäki, T. T., Saari, P., Hartikainen, J., Rantanen, T., Paajanen, H., & Manninen, H.
Affiliations
  • Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Kärkkäinen, Jussi M.
Venue
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Published
2015-03-05
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
1119-1129
ISSN
  • 0174-1551 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-086X
OpenAlex
W2061209061
Cited by
77
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
Keywords
acute mesenteric ischemia, endovascular treatment, superior mesenteric artery occlusion, embolic occlusion, thrombotic occlusion, bypass surgery, bowel resection, mortality, complications
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Endovascular Procedures, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review