Cited by 35Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

Debate: Whether an endovascular-first strategy is the optimal approach for treating acute mesenteric ischemia

Open access
Björck, Martin, Orr, Nathan, Endean, Eric D.·2015·Journal of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Acute mesenteric ischemia continues to be a life-threatening insult in often-elderly patients with many comorbidities. Recognition and correct diagnosis can be an issue leading to delays in therapy that result in loss of bowel or life, or both. The basic surgical principals in treating acute mesenteric ischemia have long been early recognition, resuscitation, urgent revascularization, resection of necrotic bowel, and reassessment with second-look laparotomies. Endovascular techniques now offer a less invasive alternative, but whether an endovascular-first or open surgery-first approach is preferred in most patients is unclear. Our discussants will attempt to clarify these issues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.431

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A completion angiogram is necessary following endovascular treatment to assess revascularization.

    “A completion angiogram is necessary following endovascular treatment to assess revascularization[96].”

    From Ischemic bowel disease in 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [96]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Beaulieu RJ, Arnaoutakis KD, Abularrage CJ, Efron DT, Schneider E, Black JH 3rd. Comparison of open and endovascular treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2014;59:159-64.
  2. Debus ES, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Kölbel T, Larena-Avellaneda A. Intes- tinal ischemia. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011;26:1087-97.
  3. Wyers MC, Powell RJ, Nolan BW, Cronenwett JL. Retrograde mesenteric stenting during laparotomy for acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2007;45:269-75.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Björck, M., Orr, N., & Endean, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
  • Björck, Martin
  • Endean, Eric D.
Venue
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
767-772
ISSN
0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148464081
Cited by
35
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Keywords
acute mesenteric ischemia, endovascular treatment, open surgery, mesenteric revascularization, second-look laparotomy, elderly patients, comorbidities, delayed diagnosis
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Humans, Risk Factors, Splanchnic Circulation, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection, Early Diagnosis, Endovascular Procedures, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review