Cited by 5Endometriosis Research and TreatmentDermatologic Treatments and ResearchUterine Myomas and Treatments

Radiofrequency Ablation: A Promising Treatment Method for Abdominal Wall Endometriosis

Mahdavi, Ali, Forouzannia, Seyed Ali, Goudarzi, Ehsan, Forouzannia, Seyed Mohammad, Rafiei, Romina, Yousefimoghaddam, Fateme, Rafiei, Niloufar, Padmehr, Roya·2024·CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the application of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as a treatment method for abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE).Materials and methods The characteristics of the AWE lesions in the patients were obtained using ultrasound (US). The patients received general and local anesthesia, and then, AWE lesions were divided into 1 cm 3 sections visually, and each of these sections underwent US-guided RFA using the moving shot technique. Follow-up included outpatient appointments, including a US examination 1, 3, and 6 months after the treatment to assess the volume of the lesions. In addition, the level of pain experienced by the patients was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) before and the day after the procedure, as well as at each follow-up appointment.Results Ten patients were treated with RFA. The procedural success was achieved in all of the patients. The median volume of the lesions decreased from 7.3 cm 3 (IQR = 4.39,23.75) to 2.95 cm 3 (IQR = 1.65,9.09) (P = 0.005). All patients reported reduced pain levels, and the median of their VAS score decreased from 9 (IQR = 8,9) to 0 (IQR = 0,1.25) (P = 0.004) at the end of the follow-up period. None of the patients experienced complications related to RFA treatment.Conclusion Based on the study's findings, RFA appears to be a promising minimally invasive treatment for AWE. However, larger studies with longer follow-up periods are required for a more comprehensive understanding of its efficacy and safety.Level of evidence Level 4, Case Series.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00270-024-03755-4

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahdavi, A., Forouzannia, S. A., Goudarzi, E., Forouzannia, S. M., Rafiei, R., Yousefimoghaddam, F., Rafiei, N., & Padmehr, R.
Affiliations
  • Imam Hossein Hospital (IR)
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
  • Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (IR)
Corresponding author
  • Forouzannia, Seyed Ali
  • Forouzannia, Seyed Mohammad
Venue
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Published
2024-05-29
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
1009-1014
ISSN
  • 0174-1551 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-086X
OpenAlex
W4399122116
Cited by
5
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
abdominal wall endometriosis, radiofrequency ablation, ultrasound-guided ablation, lesion volume reduction, analgesia, minimally invasive treatment, endometriosis treatment
MeSH terms
Radiofrequency Ablation, Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Pain Measurement, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Abdominal Wall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review