Cited by 97Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation, and Outcomes for Abdominal Wall Endometriosis

Khan, Zaraq, Zanfagnin, Valentina, El-Nashar, Sherif A., Famuyide, Abimbola O., Daftary, Gaurang S., Hopkins, Matthew R.·2017·Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Abstract

Study objective To evaluate the risk factors, presentation, and outcomes in cases of abdominal wall endometriosis.Design A case-control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).Setting An academic medical center.Patients A total of 102 (34 cases and 68 controls) were included.Interventions Surgical resection of abdominal wall endometriosis.Measurements and main results Cases underwent surgical excision for abdominal wall endometriosis at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2013. For each case, 2 controls were randomly selected from a list of women who had surgery in the same year with minimal (American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage I-II) endometriosis. A chart review was completed for variables of interest. Regression models were used to identify independent risk factors associated with abdominal wall endometriosis.Results In 14 years, 2539 women had surgery for endometriosis at Mayo Clinic. Of these, only 34 (1.34%) had abdominal wall endometriosis. The mean age was 35.2 ± 5.9 years, and the median parity was 2 (range, 0-5). Clinical examination diagnosed abdominal wall endometriosis in 41% of cases, with the cesarean delivery scar being the most common site (59%). There was a strong correlation between the size of the lesion on clinical examination compared with the size of the pathology specimen (r 2 = 0.74, p < .001). When compared with controls, cases had significantly higher parity and body mass index, more cyclic localized abdominal pain, less dysmenorrhea, longer duration from the start of symptoms to surgery, and more gynecologic surgeries for symptoms without cure. In the final multivariable model, cyclic localized abdominal pain, absence of dysmenorrhea, and previous laparotomy were independently associated with abdominal wall endometriosis with adjusted odds ratios of 10.6 (95% CI 1.85-104.4, p < .001), 12.4 (95% CI 1.64-147.1, p < .001), and 70.1 (95% CI 14.8-597.7, p < .001), respectively, with an area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87-0.98). After excision of the disease, repeat surgery was needed in 2 (5.9%) patients with a median time to recurrence of 50.5 (range, 36-65) months.Conclusions Abdominal wall endometriosis is a rare but unique form of endometriosis. Careful history and clinical examination can provide accurate diagnosis and avoid unnecessary delay before surgical intervention. Localized cyclic abdominal pain with the absence of dysmenorrhea and a history of prior laparotomy are independent risk factors with very high accuracy for diagnosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.005

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, Z., Zanfagnin, V., El-Nashar, S. A., Famuyide, A. O., Daftary, G. S., & Hopkins, M. R.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Khan, Zaraq
Venue
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
478-484
ISSN
1553-4650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2573017223
Cited by
97
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
abdominal wall endometriosis, risk factors, clinical features, dysmenorrhea, previous laparotomy, body mass index, parity, surgical excision, endometriosis diagnosis, clinicopathological correlation, recurrence risk factors, surgical outcomes, endometrioma, endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Cicatrix, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Laparotomy, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation, Risk Factors, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Abdominal Pain, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Abdominal Wall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review