Cited by 10Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseases

Structural aspects of fungal allergens

Open access
Crameri, Reto·2015·Seminars in Immunopathology

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of solved crystal structures of allergens, the key question why some proteins are allergenic and the vast majority is not remains unanswered. The situation is not different for fungal allergens which cover a wide variety of proteins with different chemical properties and biological functions. They cover enzymes, cell wall, secreted, and intracellular proteins which, except cross-reactive allergens, does not show any evidence for structural similarities at least at the three-dimensional level. However, from a diagnostic point of view, pure allergens biotechnologically produced by recombinant technology can provide us, in contrast to fungal extracts which are hardly producible as standardized reagents, with highly pure perfectly standardized diagnostic reagents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00281-014-0458-0

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of purified recombinant A. fumigatus allergens has the potential to substantially increase the specificity and sensitivity of diagnosis of A. fumigatus-related diseases, including ABPA.

    “Use of purified recombinant A. fumigatus allergens (see the allergome database www.allergome.org for the recombinant A. fumigatus allergens, developed by R. Crameri [52, 53]) has the potential to substantially increase the specificity and sensitivity of diagnosis of A. fumigatus-related diseases, including ABPA.”

    From Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019 (2019) · cites this paper as [53]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crameri, R.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Crameri, Reto
Venue
Seminars in Immunopathology
Published
2014-11-21
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
117-121
ISSN
  • 1863-2297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2300
OpenAlex
W2087328855
Cited by
10
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Immunopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
fungal allergens, allergenicity, protein structure, crystal structure, cross-reactive allergens, recombinant allergens, fungal extracts, allergen diagnosis
MeSH terms
Allergens, Antigens, Fungal, Cross Reactions, Fungi, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Models, Molecular, Molecular Structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review