Cited by 5Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic diversity and population structure

Genomic Structure and Selection History across Angus Populations Worldwide: Insights from ROH, Selection Mapping, and Functional Analyses

Open access
Mulim, Henrique A., Campos, Gabriel S., Cardoso, Fernando F., Pedrosa, Victor Breno, Latimer, Kajal, Upperman, Lindsay R., Knowles, A. J., Garcia, Andre +3 more·2026·Mammalian Genome

Abstract

Angus cattle, originally from Scotland, have been selectively bred for over 400 years, making them one of the most prominent beef breeds globally. Known for their adaptability, natural polled traits, and high-quality beef, Angus cattle have been intensively selected for growth, body size, and feed efficiency. This study investigates the genetic diversity, selection history, and key genomic regions across five Angus populations from the USA, Canada, Australia, Brazil, and Red Angus of America. Genomic data from 71,283 animals born between 1961 and 2024 were analyzed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), phylogenetic tree construction, and Runs of Homozygosity (ROH), with the Generation Proxy Selection Mapping (GPSM) approach used to assess selection history. Functional annotation identified candidate genes and pathways related to selection. Our analysis revealed both similarities and differences across populations. The PCA and FST metrics showed minimal differentiation between the American, Canadian, Australian, and Brazilian populations, with greater differentiation observed in the Red Angus population. The ROH analysis revealed that the Brazilian population had the highest number of ROHs. The ROH islands identified on BTA8 and BTA13 in the American and Australian populations were linked to traits like body weight, marbling, and tenderness. The GPSM identified significant markers associated with body weight and growth in all populations, reflecting ongoing selection pressures. This study highlights the potential of genomics to improve our understanding of Angus cattle's genetic architecture and selection history. It underscores the feasibility of integrating global populations for more accurate genomic evaluations, enhancing genetic predictions, and supporting sustainable beef production worldwide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00335-025-10188-y

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the United States, the establishment of the "Certified Angus Beef" brand in 1978 further focused the breeding objectives for intramuscular fat content, achieving standardized and premium product quality.

    “In the United States, the establishment of the “Certified Angus Beef” brand in 1978 further focused the breeding objectives for intramuscular fat content, achieving standardized and premium product quality [80].”

    From The Genomic Landscape of Cattle: Domestication, Dispersal, and Adaptive Evolution (2026) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says branded beef programs partly facilitated Angus selective breeding and describes the breed as valued for marbled, high-quality beef. It does not identify Certified Angus Beef, give a 1978 establishment date, or say that this brand focused US breeding on intramuscular fat and achieved standardized premium quality. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulim, H. A., Campos, G. S., Cardoso, F. F., Pedrosa, V. B., Latimer, K., Upperman, L. R., Knowles, A. J., Garcia, A., Retallick, K., Miller, S., & de Oliveira, H. R.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Embrapa (BR)
  • Neogen (United States) (US)
  • New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU)
Corresponding author
Mulim, Henrique A.
Venue
Mammalian Genome
Published
2025-12-22
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
19-19
ISSN
  • 0938-8990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1777
OpenAlex
W7116690248
Cited by
5
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mammalian Genome (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
Angus cattle, selection history, runs of homozygosity, genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, beef cattle, growth traits, body weight, marbling, meat tenderness, candidate genes, genomic evaluation, Red Angus
MeSH terms
Animals, Australia, Cattle, Chromosome Mapping, Genetics, Population, Homozygote, Phylogeny, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Genome, Genomics, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review