Cited by 214Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchSexual function and dysfunction studies

Pelvic floor muscle training in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual dysfunction

Open access
Bø, Kari·2012·World Journal of Urology

Abstract

Objectives The objectives of the present review was to present and discuss evidence for pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training on female stress urinary incontinence (SUI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and sexual dysfunction.Methods This manuscript is based on conclusions and data presented in systematic reviews on PFM training for SUI, POP and sexual dysfunction. Cochrane reviews, the 4th International Consultation on Incontinence, the NICE guidelines and the Health Technology Assessment were used as data sources. In addition, a new search on Pubmed was done from 2008 to 2011. Only data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English language is presented and discussed.Results There is Level 1, Grade A evidence that PFM training is effective in treatment of SUI. Short-term cure rates assessed as <2 g of leakage on pad testing vary between 35 and 80%. To date there are 5 RCTs showing significant effect of PFM training on either POP stage, symptoms or PFM morphology. Supervised and more intensive training is more effective than unsupervised training. There are no adverse effects. There is a lack of RCTs addressing the effect of PFM training on sexual dysfunction.Conclusions PFM training should be first line treatment for SUI and POP, but the training needs proper instruction and close follow-up to be effective. More high quality RCTs are warranted on PFM training to treat sexual dysfunction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00345-011-0779-8

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bø, K.
Affiliations
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
Bø, Kari
Venue
World Journal of Urology
Published
2011-10-09
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
437-443
ISSN
  • 0724-4983 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-8726
OpenAlex
W1987602655
Cited by
214
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
pelvic floor muscle training, female stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, sexual dysfunction, first-line therapy, pelvic floor morphology
MeSH terms
Abdominal Muscles, Biofeedback, Psychology, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Floor, Muscle Strength, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review