Cited by 480Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchSexual function and dysfunction studies

Pelvic floor muscle training is effective in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, but how does it work?

B�, Kari·2004·International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Abstract

To date several randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training is effective in the treatment of female stress (SUI) and mixed urinary incontinence and, therefore, it is recommended as a first-line therapy. While the effectiveness of treatment is established, there are different theoretical rationales for why PFM training is effective. The aims of this article are to discuss the theories behind why PFM training is effective in treating SUI and to discuss each theory in the framework of new knowledge of functional anatomy and examples of results from RCTs. There are three proposed theories to explain the effectiveness of PFM training for SUI: 1) women learn to consciously pre-contract the PFMs before and during increases in abdominal pressure (such as coughing, physical activity) to prevent leakage; 2) strength training builds up long-lasting muscle volume and thus provides structural support; and 3) abdominal muscle training indirectly strengthens the PFM. The first can be placed in a behavioral construct, while the two latter both have the aim of changing neuromuscular function and morphology, thus making the PFM contraction automatic. To date there are RCTs and basic anatomy studies to support the first two concepts only.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-004-1125-0

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
B�, K.
Corresponding author
B�, Kari
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
76-84
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W2155933342
Cited by
480
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 28
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
pelvic floor muscle training, female stress urinary incontinence, mixed urinary incontinence, resistance training, abdominal muscle strengthening, neuromuscular function, pelvic floor morphology, functional anatomy
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Muscle Contraction, Muscle, Smooth, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pelvic Floor, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review