Cited by 338Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTime Series Analysis and ForecastingGait Recognition and Analysis

A multibranch CNN-BiLSTM model for human activity recognition using wearable sensor data

Challa, Sravan Kumar, Kumar, Akhilesh, Semwal, Vijay Bhaskar·2022·The Visual Computer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00371-021-02283-3

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Challa, S. K., Kumar, A., & Semwal, V. B.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur (IN)
  • Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Challa, Sravan Kumar
Venue
The Visual Computer
Published
2021-08-20
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
4095-4109
ISSN
  • 0178-2789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2315
OpenAlex
W3193597430
Cited by
338
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 1
FWCI
18.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Visual Computer (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology (ECR/2018/000203)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
human activity recognition, wearable sensors, automatic feature extraction, time series classification, long-range dependencies, smartphone sensor data, WISDM, UCI-HAR, PAMAP2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review