CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes

Goyal, Anshit, Lu, Victor M., Yolcu, Yagiz U., Elminawy, Mohamed, Daniels, David J.·2018·Child's Nervous System
DOI 10.1007/s00381-018-3852-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction Surgery for craniosynostosis remains a crucial element in successful management. Intervention by both endoscopic and open approaches has been proven effective. Given the differences in timing and indications for these procedures, differences in perioperative outcomes have yet to be thoroughly compared between the two approaches. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the available evidence of perioperative outcomes between the two approaches in order to better influence the management paradigm of craniosynostosis.Methods We followed recommended PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Seven electronic databases were searched to identify all potentially relevant studies published from inception to February 2018 which were then screened against a set of selection criteria. Data were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions.Results Twelve studies satisfied all the selection criteria to be included, which described a pooled cohort involving 2064 craniosynostosis patients, with 965 (47%) and 1099 (53%) patients undergoing surgery by endoscopic and open approaches respectively. When compared to the open approach, it was found that the endoscopic approach conferred statistically significant reductions in blood loss (MD = 162.4 mL), operative time (MD = 112.38 min), length of stay (MD = 2.56 days), and rates of perioperative complications (OR = 0.58), reoperation (OR = 0.37) and transfusion (OR = 0.09), where all p < 0.001.Conclusion Both endoscopic and open approaches for the surgical management of craniosynostosis are viable considerations. The endoscopic approach confers a significant reduction in operative and postoperative morbidity when compared to the open approach. Given that specific indications for either approach should be considered when managing a patient, the difference in perioperative outcomes remain an important element of this paradigm. Future studies will validate the findings of this study and consider long-term outcomes, which will all contribute to rigor of craniosynostosis management.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00381-018-3852-4

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lannelongue M (1890) De La Craniectomie Dans La Microcephalie. CR Seances Acad Sci 110:1382

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–106 of 106

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Goyal, A., Lu, V. M., Yolcu, Y. U., Elminawy, M., & Daniels, D. J.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Daniels, David J.
ORCID
Venue
Child's Nervous System
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-06-30
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
1627-1637
ISSN
  • 0256-7040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-0350
DOI
10.1007/s00381-018-3852-4
OpenAlex
W2810060657
Cited by
106
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Child s Nervous System (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
craniosynostosis, perioperative outcomes, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, reoperation, blood transfusion
MeSH terms
Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Humans, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Neuroendoscopy, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review