Cited by 49Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthGut microbiota and health

Probiotics during weaning: a follow-up study on effects on body composition and metabolic markers at school age

Karlsson Videhult, Frida, Öhlund, Inger, Stenlund, Hans, Hernell, Olle, West, Christina E.·2015·European Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Purpose An aberrant gut microbiome has been suggested to contribute to the worldwide epidemic of obesity. In animal models, the probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei F19 (LF19) induced upregulation of genes involved in energy homoeostasis, reduced body fat and altered the serum (S) lipoprotein profile. In our previous report, feeding LF19 to infants during weaning impacted the global plasma metabolome. LF19 lowered palmitoleic acid, a monounsaturated fatty acid associated with hypertriglyceridemia and increased visceral adiposity. Therefore, we assessed if feeding LF19 from 4 to 13 months of age would have long-term effects on body composition, growth and metabolic markers.Methods Of 179 children included in our baseline study, 120 entered the follow-up at 8-9 years of age, n = 58 in the probiotic and n = 62 in the placebo group. Body composition was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Anthropometrics of the child and accompanying parent(s) were assessed. S-lipids, insulin, glucose and transaminases were determined after overnight fasting.Results LF19 did not affect body mass index z-score, sagittal abdominal diameter, fat-free mass, fat mass index, truncal fat %, android or gynoid fat % and had no long-term impact on any of the assessed metabolic markers (p > 0.05).Conclusion Feeding LF19 during infancy did not modulate body composition, growth or any of the assessed metabolic markers at school age. The steady increase in probiotic products targeting infants and children calls for long-term follow-up of initiated probiotic intervention studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00394-014-0715-y

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies evaluating rates of childhood obesity following probiotic therapy in the perinatal and infant period have not reported any adverse events with respect to body mass index.

    “Importantly, studies evaluating rates of childhood obesity following probiotic therapy in the perinatal and infant period have not reported any AEs with respect to body mass index.133, ,134”

    From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [133]

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karlsson Videhult, F., Öhlund, I., Stenlund, H., Hernell, O., & West, C. E.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
West, Christina E.
Venue
European Journal of Nutrition
Published
2014-05-17
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
355-363
ISSN
  • 1436-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-6215
OpenAlex
W1977037397
Cited by
49
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Västerbotten Läns Landsting
  • Umeå Universitet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, infant weaning, body composition, childhood obesity, long-term follow-up, metabolic biomarkers, serum lipids, insulin, growth, gut microbiota, palmitoleic acid, visceral fat
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Child, Demography, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Lactobacillus, Male, Motor Activity, Weaning, Biomarkers, Absorptiometry, Photon, Body Mass Index, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review