Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of age-related hearing loss in Europe: a review

Open access
Roth, Thomas Niklaus, Hanebuth, Dirk, Probst, Rudolf·2011·European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract

Populations are becoming progressively older thus presenting symptoms of diminished organ function due to degenerative processes. These may be physiological or caused by additional factors damaging the organ. Presbyacusis refers to the physiological age-related changes of the peripheral and central auditory system leading to hearing impairment and difficulty understanding spoken language. In contrast to epidemiological data of other continents, the prevalence of age-related hearing loss (ARHL) in Europe is not well defined, due in part to the use of different classification systems. We performed a systematic literature review with the aim of gaining a picture of the prevalence of ARHL in Europe. The review included only population and epidemiological studies in English since 1970 with samples in European countries with subjects aged 60 years and above. Nineteen studies met our selection criteria and additional five studies reported self-reported hearing impairment. When these data were crudely averaged and interpolated, roughly 30% of men and 20% of women in Europe were found to have a hearing loss of 30 dB HL or more by age 70 years, and 55% of men and 45% of women by age 80 years. Apparent problems in comparing the available data were the heterogeneity of measures and cut-offs for grades of hearing impairment. Our systematic review of epidemiological data revealed more information gaps than information that would allow gaining a meaningful picture of prevalence of ARHL. The need for standardized procedures when collecting and reporting epidemiological data on hearing loss has become evident. Development of hearing loss over time in conjunction with the increase in life expectancy is a major factor determining strategies of detection and correction of ARHL. Thus, we recommend using the WHO classification of hearing loss strictly and including standard audiometric measures in population-based health surveys.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00405-011-1597-8

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Megighian D et al (2000) Audiometric and epidemiological analysis of elderly in the Veneto region. Gerontology 46(4):199–204 · doi:10.1159/000022160
  2. Martini A et al (1997) Audiometric patterns of genetic non-syndromal sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 36(4):228–236 · doi:10.3109/00206099709071975
  3. Uimonen S et al (1999) Do we know the real need for hearing rehabilitation at the population level? Hearing impairments in the 5- to 75-year-old cross-sectional Finnish population. Br J Audiol 33(1):53–59 · DOI
  4. Uimonen S et al (1997) Hearing in 55 to 75 year old people in northern Finland—a comparison of two classifications of hearing impairment. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 529:69–70 · doi:10.3109/00016489709124084
  5. Davis A, Davis K, Smith P (2009) The prevalence of deafness and hearing impairment. In: Graham J, Martin M (eds) Ballantyne’s Deafness. Wiley, pp 6–19
  6. Bergmann B, Rosenhall U (2001) Vision and hearing in old age. Scand Audiol 30(4):255–263 · doi:10.1080/01050390152704779
  7. Moller MB (1981) Hearing in 70 and 75 year old people: results from a cross sectional and longitudinal population study. Am J Otolaryngol 2(1):22–29 · doi:10.1016/s0196-0709(81)80005-1
  8. Rosenhall U, Karlsson Espmark AK (2003) Hearing aid rehabilitation: what do older people want, and what does the audiogram tell? Int J Audiol 42(Suppl 2):253–257
  9. Engdahl B et al (2005) Screened and unscreened hearing threshold levels for the adult population: results from the Nord-Trondelag Hearing Loss Study. Int J Audiol 44(4):213–230 · doi:10.1080/14992020500057731
  10. Rahko T et al (1985) Prevalence of handicapping hearing loss in an aging population. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 94(2 Pt 1):140–144 · doi:10.1177/000348948509400208
  11. Wilson PS, Fleming DM, Donaldson I (1993) Prevalence of hearing loss among people aged 65 years and over: screening and hearing aid provision. Br J Gen Pract 43(375):406–409
  12. Hietanen A et al (2005) Hearing among 75-year-old people in three Nordic localities: a comparative study. Int J Audiol 44(9):500–508 · doi:10.1080/14992020500189112
  13. Smits C, Houtgast T (2005) Results from the Dutch speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Ear Hear 26(1):89–95 · doi:10.1097/00003446-200502000-00008
  14. Rosenhall U, Jonsson R, Soderlind O (1999) Self-assessed hearing problems in Sweden: a demographic study. Audiology 38(6):328–334 · doi:10.3109/00206099909073044
  15. Martini A et al (2001) Hearing in the elderly: a population study. Audiology 40(6):285–293 · doi:10.3109/00206090109073124
  16. Sanders DA (1975) Hearing aid orientation and counselling. In: Pollack MC (ed) Amplification for the hearing-impaired. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 121–128
  17. Sakamoto M et al (1998) Average thresholds in the 8 to 20 kHz range as a function of age. Scand Audiol 27(3):189–192 · doi:10.1080/010503998422728
  18. Murdin L et al (2008) Hearing difficulties are common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 27(5):637–640 · doi:10.1007/s10067-007-0802-z
  19. Gates G, Popelka G (1992) Neural presbycusis: a diagnostic dilemma. Am J Otol 13(4):313–317
  20. Otto W, McCandless G (1982) Aging and auditory site of lesion. Ear Hear 3(3):110–117 · doi:10.1097/00003446-198205000-00003
  21. Davis A (1995) Hearing in adults. Whurr, London

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Roth, T. N., Hanebuth, D., & Probst, R.
Venue
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2011-04-17
Volume
268
Issue
8
Pages
1101-1107
ISSN
  • 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4726
OpenAlex
W2030003781
Cited by
332
References
27
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of age-related hearing loss in Europe: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00405-011-1597-8
The paper
Roth, T. N., Hanebuth, D., & Probst, R. (2011). Prevalence of age-related hearing loss in Europe: a review. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1597-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.