Cited by 54Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Divided and selective attention in panic disorder

Lautenbacher, Stefan, Spernal, Julia, Krieg, J�rgen-Christian·2002·European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Objective While depression is definitely a condition with diminished attentional functioning, there is little evidence as to whether attention is also disturbed in panic disorder. In the present study patients with panic disorder and with depression were compared by means of neuropsychological tests which assess selective and divided attention.Method Twenty-one inpatients with a Panic Disorder, 21 inpatients with a Major Depressive Disorder (DSM-IV diagnoses) and 20 healthy control subjects were investigated drug free. Neuropsychological standard tests were used to measure selective attention (Signal Detection, Wiener-Test-system) and divided attention (Gesichtsfeld-/Neglectprüfung, TAP), which allow the discrimination between left and right visual field stimulus processing.Results Patients with panic disorder and depression responded significantly slower than healthy control subjects in the test for divided attention, while no differences were found between the two groups of patients. In contrast, there were no differences among the groups of patients and control subjects in regard to reaction time in the test for selective attention. Stimulus presentations in the left and right visual fields did not affect the reaction times differently.Conclusions Patients with panic disorder appeared as disturbed in their attentional functioning as patients with depression. Therefore, ignoring attentional deficits in patients with panic disorder is not justified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00406-002-0382-5

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of unmedicated adults with major depressive disorder reveal impairments in performing two tasks simultaneously and in simultaneously attending auditory and visual stimuli to detect targets compared with healthy controls.

    “In the context of MDD, studies of unmedicated adults have revealed impairments in performing two tasks simultaneously34, and simultaneously attending both auditory and visual stimuli to detect targets35 compared with healthy controls.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [34]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lautenbacher, S., Spernal, J., & Krieg, J.-C.
Affiliations
Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Venue
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2002-10-01
Volume
252
Issue
5
Pages
210-213
ISSN
  • 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
  • 0940-1334
  • 1433-8491
OpenAlex
W2413923995
Cited by
54
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
panic disorder, major depressive disorder, divided attention, selective attention, attention deficits, visual field neglect, reaction time, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Severity of Illness Index, Visual Fields, Visual Perception, Panic Disorder, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review