Cited by 63Mental Health and PsychiatrySchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Double bookkeeping and schizophrenia spectrum: divided unified phenomenal consciousness

Open access
Parnas, Josef, Urfer-Parnas, Annick, Stephensen, Helene·2021·European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Eugen Bleuler, the founder of the concept of schizophrenia, pointed out that psychotic patients were able to live in two disjoint worlds (namely, the social, intersubjective world and the delusional world). He termed this phenomenon “double bookkeeping,” but did not provide any conceptual elaboration of this phenomenon or its possible mechanisms. Double bookkeeping has been neglected in mainstream psychiatry, but it has been addressed in recent theoretical work, however mainly concerned with the issue of delusion. In this article, we present clinical material that supports the view that double bookkeeping manifests itself across various psychotic phenomena and its antecedent may be observed in premorbid (pre-onset) phases as well as in the schizotypal disorder. We try to conceptualize double bookkeeping to concretize an often atmospheric perception of paradoxicality in the encounter with the patient. A phenomenological analysis of double bookkeeping suggests an instability in the affective (“auto-affection”) articulation of selfhood. We point to four main implications of our presentation: (1) diagnostic, (2) epistemological, (3) therapeutic and (4) pathogenetic research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00406-020-01185-0

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [9]Schreber DP (1988) Memoirs of my nervous illness (trans. I. Macalpine & R. Hunter). Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA (Original work published 1903)
  2. [15]Schmidt G (1987) A review of the German literature on delusion between 1914–1939. In: Cutting J, Shepherd M (eds) The clinical roots of the schizophrenia concept. Translations of seminal European contributions on schizophrenia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 104–134 (Original work published 1949)
  3. [17]Jaspers K (1997) General psychopathology (trans. J. Hoenig & M. W. Hamilton). Johns Hopkins University Press, London (Original work published 1913)
  4. [20]Conrad K Die beginnende Schizophrenie: versuch einer Gestaltanalyse des Wahns 1958 Stuttgart Georg Thieme Verlag 4023115
  5. [35]Schneider K (1959) Clinical Psychopathology (trans. M. W. Hamilton). Grune & Stratton, New York NY (Original work published 1950)
  6. [45]Wyrsch J (1956) La personne du schizophrène, Étude clinique, psychologique anthropophénoménologique (trans. J. Verdeaux). PUF, Paris (Original work published 1949)
  7. [51]Henry M Davidson S Seyler F Descartes’s cogito and the idea of an ideal phenomenology The michel henry reader 2019 Evanston Northwestern University Press 108 123
  8. [63]Rümke HC Der klinische differenzierung innerhalb der gruppe der schizophrenien Nervenarzt 1958 29 40 53 13517461
  9. [65]Parnas J Waters F Stephane M Philosophical and phenomenological perspectives on psychosis The assessment of psychosis: a reference book and rating scales for research and practice 2015 New York Routledge 17 43

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parnas, J., Urfer-Parnas, A., & Stephensen, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Amager Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Stephensen, Helene
Venue
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2020-09-08
Volume
271
Issue
8
Pages
1513-1523
ISSN
  • 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
  • 0940-1334
  • 1433-8491
OpenAlex
W3084151659
Cited by
63
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
41.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
double-entry bookkeeping, schizophrenia spectrum, schizotypy, delusions, phenomenology of psychosis, selfhood, auto-affection, neuroticism, Eugen Bleuler, therapeutic implications
MeSH terms
Consciousness, Humans, Psychiatry, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review