Cited by 74Pulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsVascular Anomalies and TreatmentsEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology

High levels of nitric oxide in individuals with pulmonary hypertension receiving epoprostenol therapy

özkan, M., Dweik, R.A., Laskowski, D., Arroliga, A.C., Erzurum, S.C.·2001·Lung

Abstract

Lack of vasodilator substances, such as nitric oxide (NO), has been implicated in the development of pulmonary hypertension, but the pathogenesis of the disease remains speculative. We hypothesized that NO plays a role in the pathogenesis of primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH), and may serve as a sensitive and specific marker of disease progression and/or severity. To test this, exhaled NO and pulmonary artery pressure were measured in individuals with PPH and secondary pulmonary hypertension (SPH) on various therapies, including the potent vasodilator epoprostenol (prostacyclin), compared with healthy controls. NO in exhaled breath of individuals with PPH was lower than SPH or control (p<0.05). In contrast, exhaled NO of individuals with PPH or SPH receiving epoprostenol was strikingly higher than PPH or SPH individuals not receiving epoprostenol, or controls. Concomitant with higher NO levels, right ventricular systolic pressure of individuals significantly decreased with epoprostenol. Importantly, in paired measures of exhaled NO before and after epoprostenol, NO increased in all pulmonary hypertensive individuals 24 h after initiation of epoprostenol therapy (p<0.05). NO may be a useful noninvasive marker of pulmonary hypertension severity and response to prostacyclin therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004080000064

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
özkan, M., Dweik, R. A., Laskowski, D., Arroliga, A. C., & Erzurum, S. C.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Venue
Lung
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
179
Issue
4
Pages
233-243
ISSN
0341-2040 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041451562
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lung (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-60917)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Vascular Anomalies and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Keywords
nitric oxide, pulmonary hypertension, epoprostenol, prostacyclin therapy, exhaled nitric oxide, idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, secondary pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricular systolic pressure, disease severity markers, treatment response biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antihypertensive Agents, Breath Tests, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Male, Middle Aged, Nitric Oxide, Epoprostenol, Vasodilator Agents, Biomarkers, Respiratory Mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review