Cited by 12Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsNuclear Structure and FunctionChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Changes in chromatin structure correlate with transcriptional activity of nucleolar rDNA in polytene chromosomes

Plata, Maria Piedad, Kang, Hyuck Joon, Zhang, Shaofei, Kuruganti, Srilalitha, Hsu, Shih-Jui, Labrador, Mariano·2009·Chromosoma

Abstract

Ribosomal DNA genes (rDNA) are found in tandem arrays of hundreds of repeated genes, but only a fraction of these genes are actively transcribed. The regulatory mechanism controlling the transition between active and inactive rDNA in higher eukaryotes is vital for cell survival. Here, we show that the nucleolus from Drosophila salivary gland cells contains two levels of chromatin organization reflecting differences in transcriptional activity: Decondensed chromatin is highly occupied with TATA-box-binding protein (TBP), phosphorylated H3S10, and acetylated H3K14, suggesting that rDNA in decondensed nucleolar areas is actively transcribed. Condensed chromatin lacks TBP, phosphorylated H3S10, or acetylated H3K14 and is enriched in the rDNA retrotransposons R1 and R2. The data show that R1 and R2 retrotransposons are not actively transcribed in salivary glands and may lead to the epigenetic silencing of flanking rDNA genes and that the silencing mechanisms of these sequences might be partially independent of heterochromatin formation by methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 and binding of heterochromatin protein 1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00412-008-0198-9

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plata, M. P., Kang, H. J., Zhang, S., Kuruganti, S., Hsu, S.-J., & Labrador, M.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Labrador, Mariano
Venue
Chromosoma
Published
2008-12-09
Volume
118
Issue
3
Pages
303-322
ISSN
  • 0009-5915 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0886
OpenAlex
W2037087353
Cited by
12
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chromosoma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R21GM078132, GM78132-2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
ribosomal DNA, nucleolus, chromatin structure, rDNA transcription, polytene chromosomes, Drosophila salivary gland, TATA-binding protein, histone H3K14 acetylation, epigenetic silencing, heterochromatin, histone H3 lysine 9 methylation, HP1, chromatin decondensation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Nucleolus, Chromatin, Chromosomes, DNA, Ribosomal, Drosophila, Histones, Salivary Glands, Genes, Insect, Retroelements, TATA-Box Binding Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review