Cited by 19Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Scavenger activity in a peri-urban agricultural setting in the Highveld of South Africa

Keyes, Craig A., Myburgh, J., Brits, D.·2021·International Journal of Legal Medicine

Abstract

Scavenging animals often scatter skeletal remains of forensic interest and cause scavenging damage. This study aimed to identify scavenging animals in the peri-urban agricultural Highveld of South Africa, describe their scattering patterns, and the damage they cause to bone. Ten pig carcasses (Sus scrofa domesticus) (40-80 kg) were placed at the University of Pretoria's Mierjie Le Roux Experimental Farm (Highveld) in summer and winter. Motion-activated cameras recorded the scavenging. Scavenger species were identified and their behaviors, scattering pattern, and the damage they cause to bone were described. Scavenging was primarily by black-backed jackals; however, mongooses (slender, yellow, and water mongoose), Cape porcupine, and honey badger were also active. Remains were commonly scattered in two directions by jackals. The distance of scattering was heavily influenced by fencing. The remains were scattered within a maximum radius of 73.7 m. The remains were scavenged and skeletonized faster in summer. Jackals caused minimal damage to bone, isolated to superficial, nonspecific scores, furrows, and punctures. A few mongoose bone alterations were present as jagged gnaw marks on the angle of the mandible and gnawing of the vertebral spinous process. Cape porcupine bone damage included gnaw marks on the condyle of a femur and head of humerus, and destruction of the proximal and distal ends of a tibia. The described scattering pattern and bone modification patterns will assist…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00414-020-02413-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Spies MJ, Gibbon VE, Finaughty DA (2018) Forensic taphonomy: vertebrate scavenging in the temperate southwestern cape, South Africa. Forensic Sci Int 290:62–69 · DOI · Paper page
  2. O'Brien RC, Forbes SL, Meyer J, Dadour I (2010) Forensically significant scavenging guilds in the southwest of Western Australia. Forensic Sci Int 198(1–3):85–91
  3. O'Brien RC, Appleton AJ, Forbes SL (2017) Comparison of taphonomic progression due to the necrophagic activity of geographically disparate scavenging guilds. Can Soc Forensic Sci J 50(1):42–53 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Spies MJ, Finaughty DA, Gibbon VE (2018) Forensic taphonomy: scavenger-induced scattering patterns in the temperate southwestern cape, South Africa—a first look. Forensic Sci Int 290:29–35 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Abay GY, Bauer H, Gebrihiwot K, Deckers J (2011) Peri-urban spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) in northern Ethiopia: diet, economic impact, and abundance. Eur J Wildl Res 57(4):759–765 · DOI
  6. Schuette P, Creel S, Christianson D (2013) Coexistence of African lions, livestock, and people in a landscape with variable human land use and seasonal movements. Biol Conserv 157:148–154 · DOI
  7. Brits DM, Steyn M, Hansmeyer C (2020) Identifying the unknown and the undocumented: the Johannesburg (South Africa) experience. In: Parra RC, Zapico SC, Ubelaker DH (eds) Forensic science and humanitarian action: interacting with the dead and the living, vol 17. John Wiley & Sons, pp 681–692 · DOI
  8. Young A, Stillman R, Smith MJ, Korstjens AH (2014) Scavenging in Northwestern Europe: a survey of UK police specialist search officers. Policing 8(2):156–164 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Young A, Stillman R, Smith MJ, Korstjens AH (2016) Applying knowledge of species-typical scavenging behavior to the search and recovery of mammalian skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci 61(2):458–466 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Reeves NM (2009) Taphonomic effects of vulture scavenging. J Forensic Sci 54(3):523–528 · DOI
  11. Keyes CA, Myburgh J, Brits D (2020) Taphonomic bone trauma caused by Southern African scavengers. Int J Legal Med 134:1227–1238 · DOI
  12. Young A, Stillman R, Smith MJ, Korstjens AH (2014) An experimental study of vertebrate scavenging behavior in a Northwest European woodland context. J Forensic Sci 59(5):1333–1342 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Young A, Stillman R, Smith MJ, Korstjens AH (2015) Scavenger species-typical alteration to bone: using bite mark dimensions to identify scavengers. J Forensic Sci 60(6):1426–1235 · DOI
  14. Rothschild MA, Schneider V (1997) On the temporal onset of postmortem animal scavenging:“motivation” of the animal. Forensic Sci Int 89(1–2):57–64 · DOI
  15. Morton RJ, Lord WD (2006) Taphonomy of child-sized remains: a study of scattering and scavenging in Virginia, USA. J Forensic Sci 51(3):475–479 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Inger R, Cox DT, Per E, Norton BA, Gaston KJ (2016) Ecological role of vertebrate scavengers in urban ecosystems in the UK. Ecol Evol 6(19):7015–7023 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Huijbers CM, Schlacher TA, Schoeman DS, Weston MA, Connolly RM (2013) Urbanisation alters processing of marine carrion on sandy beaches. Landsc Urban Plan 119:1–8 · DOI
  18. Spies MJ, Finaughty DA, Friedling LJ, Gibbon VE (2020) The effect of clothing on decomposition and vertebrate scavengers in cooler months of the temperate southwestern Cape, South Africa. Forensic Sci Int 309:110197 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Matuszewski S, Hall MJ, Moreau G, Schoenly KG, Tarone AM, Villet MH (2019) Pigs vs people: the use of pigs as analogues for humans in forensic entomology and taphonomy research. Int J Legal Med 134:793–810 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Myburgh L, L’Abbe EN, Steyn M, Becker PJ (2013) Estimating the postmortem interval (PMI) using accumulated degree-days (ADD) in a temperate region of South Africa. Forensic Sci Int 229(1–3):165e1–165e6
  21. Keough N, Myburgh J, Steyn M (2016) Scoring of decomposition: a proposed amendment to the method when using a pig model for human studies. J Forensic Sci 62(4):986–993 · DOI
  22. Stuart C, Stuart M (2017) Stuarts’ field guide to the larger mammals of Africa, 4th edn. Struik Nature, Century City
  23. Reynolds C (2015) Sasol 300 easy-to-see Birds in Southern Africa. Penguin Random House, South Africa
  24. Michaud JP, Moreau G (2011) A statistical approach based on accumulated degree-days to predict decomposition-related processes in forensic studies. J Forensic Sci 56(1):229–232 · DOI
  25. Galloway A, Birkby WH, Jones AM, Henry TE, Parks BO (1989) Decay rates of human remains in an arid environment. J Forensic Sci 34(3):607–616 · DOI
  26. Binford LR (2014) Bones: ancient men and modern myths. Academic press, New York.
  27. Haynes G (1983) A guide for differentiating mammalian carnivore taxa responsible for gnaw damage to herbivore limb bones. Paleobiology 9(2):164–172 · DOI
  28. Selvaggio MM, Wilder J (2001) Identifying the involvement of multiple carnivore taxa with archaeological bone assemblages. J Archaeol Sci 28(5):465–470 · DOI
  29. Brain CK (1983) The hunters or the hunted?: an introduction to African cave taphonomy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  30. Andrés M, Gidna AO, Yravedra J, Domínguez-Rodrigo M (2012) A study of dimensional differences of tooth marks (pits and scores) on bones modified by small and large carnivores. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 4(3):209–219 · DOI
  31. Duthie A, Skinner J (1986) Osteophagia in the cape porcupine Hystrix africaeaustralis. S Afr J Zool 21(4):316–318
  32. Rabinovitch R, Horwitz LK (1994) An experimental approach to the study of porcupine damage to bones: a gnawing issue. Artefacts 9:97–118
  33. Peterhans JK (1990) The roles of porcupines, leopards and hyenas in ungulate carcass dispersal: implications for paleoanthropology. Dissertation, University of Chicago.
  34. Kaunda SKK (2010) Black backed jackal (Canis mesomelas) predation on impala (Aepyceros melampus) at Mokolodi nature reserve Botswana. Dissertation, University of Pretoria
  35. Van de Ven TM, Tambling CJ, Kerley GI (2013) Seasonal diet of black-backed jackal in the Eastern Karoo, South Africa. J Arid Environ 99:23–27 · DOI
  36. Jenner N, Groombridge J, Funk S (2011) Commuting, territoriality and variation in group and territory size in a black-backed jackal population reliant on a clumped, abundant food resource in Namibia. J Zool 284(4):231–238 · DOI
  37. Hiscocks M (1987) Feeding observations and diet of black-backed jackals in an arid coastal environment. S Afr J Wildl Res 17(2):55–58
  38. Avery G, Avery D, Braine S, Loutit R (1987) Prey of coastal black-backed jackal Canis mesomelas (Mammalia: Canidae) in the Skeleton Coast Park, Namibia. J Zool 213(1):81–94 · DOI
  39. Rowe-Rowe D (1983) Black-backed jackal diet in relation to food availability in the Natal Drakensberg. S Afr J Wildl Res 13(1):17–23
  40. Rowe-Rowe D (1975) Predation by black-backed jackals in a sheep-farming region of Natal. S Afr J Wildl Res 5(1):79–81
  41. Asala S (2001) Sex determination from the head of the femur of South African whites and blacks. Forensic Sci Int 117(1–2):15–22 · DOI
  42. Vance VL, Steyn M, L’Abbé EN (2011) Nonmetric sex determination from the distal and posterior humerus in black and white South Africans. J Forensic Sci 56(3):710–714 · DOI
  43. Vance V, Steyn M (2013) Geometric morphometric assessment of sexually dimorphic characteristics of the distal humerus. Homo 64(5):329–340 · DOI
  44. Steyn M, İşcan MY (1999) Osteometric variation in the humerus: sexual dimorphism in South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 106(2):77–85 · DOI
  45. Steyn M, İşcan MY (1997) Sex determination from the femur and tibia in South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 90(1–2):111–119 · DOI
  46. Raxter MH, Auerbach BM, Ruff CB (2006) Revision of the fully technique for estimating statures. Am J Phys Anthropol 130(3):374–384 · DOI
  47. Dayal MR, Steyn M, Kuykendall KL (2008) Stature estimation from bones of South African whites. S Afr J Sci 104(3–4):124–128
  48. Steyn M, İşcan MY (1998) Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 98(1–2):9–16 · DOI
  49. Loth SR, Henneberg M (1996) Mandibular ramus flexure: a new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol 99(3):473–485 · DOI
  50. Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I (2008) Discriminant function sexing of the mandible of indigenous South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 179(1):84e1–84e5 · DOI
  51. Nel J, Avenant N (1975) Comparison of the diet of the yellow mongoose in a coastal and a Karoo area. S Afr J Wildl Res 22(4):89–93
  52. Taylor ME (1975) Herpestes sanguineus. Mamm Species 65:1–5 · DOI
  53. Skinner JD, Chimimba CT (2005) The mammals of the southern African sub-region. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. · DOI
  54. Louw J (1986) Diets of coastal and inland-dwelling water mongoose. S Afr J Wildl Res 16(4):153–156
  55. Somers M, Purves M (1996) Trophic overlap between three syntopic semi-aquatic carnivores: cape clawless otter, spotted-necked otter and water mongoose. Afr J Ecol 34(2):158–166 · DOI
  56. Zumpt L (1976) The yellow mongoose (Cynictis penicillata) as a latent focus of rabies in South Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc 47(3):211–213
  57. Ryan PG, Shaw JM (2015) Winter scavenging rates under power lines in the Karoo, South Africa. S Afr J Wildl Res 45(1):122–126 · DOI
  58. Brain C, Behrensmeyer A, Hill A (1980) Some criteria for the recognition of bone-collecting agencies in African caves. In: Behrensmeyer AK, Hill AP (eds) Fossils in the making: vertebrate taphonomy and paleoecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 107–130
  59. Begg C, Begg K, Du Toit J, Mills M (2003) Scent-marking behaviour of the honey badger, Mellivora capensis (Mustelidae), in the southern Kalahari. Anim Behav 66(5):917–929 · DOI
  60. Begg C, Begg K, Du Toit J, Mills M (2003) Sexual and seasonal variation in the diet and foraging behaviour of a sexually dimorphic carnivore, the honey badger (Mellivora capensis). J Zool 260(3):301–316 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Keyes, C. A., Myburgh, J., & Brits, D.
Affiliations
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
Keyes, Craig A.
Venue
International Journal of Legal Medicine
Published
2020-09-01
Volume
135
Issue
3
Pages
979-991
ISSN
  • 0044-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 0937-9827
  • 1437-1596
OpenAlex
W3082227578
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Legal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
bone injuries, black-backed jackal, mongoose, honey badger, pig carcasses, forensic taphonomy, peri-urban agriculture, Highveld
MeSH terms
Body Remains, Animals, Appetitive Behavior, Bone and Bones, Feeding Behavior, Herpestidae, Seasons, South Africa, Forensic Anthropology, Mustelidae, Jackals, Porcupines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review