Cited by 172Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Cognitive impairment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Antonelli Incalzi, Raffaele, Marra, Camillo, Giordano, Alessandro, Calcagni, Maria Lucia, Cappa, Antonella, Basso, Salvatore, Pagliari, Gabriella, Fuso, Leonello·2003·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Some analogy exists between cognitive impairment in hypoxemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We purposed to verify whether the analogy extends to the cerebral perfusion pattern. Ten normal subjects, 15 COPD patients with and 18 without hypoxemia, and 15 patients with mild AD matched for age and educational level underwent brain perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and neuropsychological assessment. Normal subjects and non hypoxemic COPD patients had comparable perfusion patterns. The average perfusion decreased from non hypoxemic to hypoxemic COPD and, then, to AD patients. Hypoperfusion of associative areas was the hallmark of AD, whereas the average perfusion of anterior cortical and subcortical regions did not distinguish AD and hypoxemic COPD patients. Both COPD groups scored higher than AD patients (p </= 0.01) in 13 cognitive tests but below the normal in selected tests of verbal attainment, attention and deductive thinking. Perfusion of anterior cortical and subcortical regions of the dominant hemisphere was directly correlated with the number of correctly performed neuropsychologic tests. In conclusion, anterior cerebral hypoperfusion and selected neuropsychological dysfunctions characterized hypoxemic COPD patients and could herald frontal-type cognitive decline with the worsening of the hypoxemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-003-1005-4

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antonelli Incalzi, R., Marra, C., Giordano, A., Calcagni, M. L., Cappa, A., Basso, S., Pagliari, G., & Fuso, L.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Fuso, Leonello
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
250
Issue
3
Pages
325-332
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W148117931
Cited by
172
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cognitive impairment, hypoxemia, Alzheimer's disease, cerebral perfusion, cerebral hypoperfusion, frontal lobe dysfunction, neuropsychological assessment, single photon emission computed tomography, attention, verbal memory
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Hypoxia, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review