Cited by 191Frailty in Older AdultsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchNutrition and Health in Aging

Frailty and respiratory impairment in older persons

Open access
Vaz Fragoso, Carlos A., Enright, Paul L., McAvay, Gail, Van Ness, Peter H., Gill, Thomas M.·2012·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Among older persons, the association between frailty and spirometry-confirmed respiratory impairment has not been evaluated yet.Methods By using data on white participants aged 65 to 80 years (Cardiovascular Health Study, N=3578), we evaluated cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between frailty and respiratory impairment, including their combined effect on mortality. Baseline assessments included frailty status (Fried phenotype: non-frail, pre-frail, and frail) and spirometry. Outcomes included development of frailty features (pre-frail or frail) at year 3 and respiratory impairment (airflow limitation or restrictive pattern) at year 4, and death (median follow-up, 13.2 years).Results At baseline, 48.3% of participants were pre-frail, 5.8% of participants were frail, 13.8% of participants had airflow limitation, and 9.3% of participants had restrictive pattern; 46.1% of participants subsequently died. At baseline, pre-frail and frail were cross-sectionally associated with airflow limitation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-2.04 and adjusted OR 1.88; 95% CI, 1.15-3.09) and restrictive pattern (adjusted OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.37-2.36 and adjusted OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.91-4.88), respectively. Longitudinally, participants with baseline frailty features had an increased likelihood of developing respiratory impairment (adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11-1.82). Conversely, participants with baseline respiratory impairment had an increased likelihood of developing frailty features (adjusted OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.17-2.13). Mortality was highest among participants who were frail and had respiratory impairment (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.91; 95% CI, 2.93-5.22), compared with those who were non-frail and had no respiratory impairment.Conclusion Frailty and respiratory impairment are strongly associated with one another and substantially increase the risk of death when both are present. Establishing these associations may inform interventions designed to reverse or prevent the progression of either condition and to reduce adverse outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.06.024

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Frailty has additionally been linked to reduced reserve in respiratory, cardiovascular, renal, blood and clotting systems, with nutrition possibly acting as a mediator.

    “it is important to recognise that frailty has also been associated with loss of physiological reserve in the respiratory (15), cardiovascular (16), renal (17) and haemopoietic and clotting systems (18, 19) and that nutritional status can also be a mediating factor (3, 20-22).”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Pulmonary function is associated with frailty.

    “Pulmonary function is associated with frailty (15)”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Pulmonary function may have utility as a straightforward detection test for frailty.

    “and may have utility as a straightforward detection test.”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaz Fragoso, C. A., Enright, P. L., McAvay, G., Van Ness, P. H., & Gill, T. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
125
Issue
1
Pages
79-86
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062841474
Cited by
191
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R03AG037051)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
frailty, respiratory dysfunction, older adults, airflow obstruction, restrictive lung pattern, pre-frailty, mortality, Fried frailty phenotype, spirometry, Cardiovascular Health Study, lung function decline, cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes mellitus, physical activity, body mass index
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Respiratory Insufficiency, Spirometry, United States, Frail Elderly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review