Cited by 160Long-Term Effects of COVID-19COVID-19 and Mental HealthCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Neurological and cognitive sequelae of COVID-19: a four month follow-up.

Open access
Mattioli, Flavia, Stampatori, Chiara, Righetti, Francesca, Sala, Emma, Tomasi, Cesare, De Palma, Giuseppe·2021·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Central and peripheral nervous system involvement during acute COVID-19 is well known. Although many patients report some subjective symptoms months after the infection, the exact incidence of neurological and cognitive sequelae of COVID-19 remains to be determined. The aim of this study is to investigate if objective neurological or cognitive impairment is detectable four months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, in a group of patients who had mild-moderate COVID-19. A cohort of 120 health care workers previously affected by COVID-19 was examined 4 months after the diagnosis by means of neurological and extensive cognitive evaluation and compared to a group of 30 health care workers who did not have COVID-19 and were similar for age and co morbidities. At 4 month follow-up, 118/120 COVID-19 cases had normal neurological examination, two patients had neurological deficits. COVID-19 patients did not show general cognitive impairment at MMSE. In COVID-19 cases the number of impaired neuropsychological tests was not significantly different from non COVID-19 cases (mean 1.69 and 1 respectively, Mann-Whitney p = n.s.), as well as all the mean tests' scores. Anxiety, stress and depression scores resulted to be significantly higher in COVID-19 than in non COVID-19 cases. The results do not support the presence of neurological deficits or cognitive impairment in this selected population of mild-moderate COVID-19 patients four months after the diagnosis. Severe emotional disorders in patients who had COVID-19 in the past are confirmed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-021-10579-6

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Delis DC Kramer JH Kaplan E Ober BA California verbal learning test, 2nd edition (CVLT-II) 2000 San Antonio, TX Psychological Corporation
  2. [21]Zimmermann P, Fimm B (1997) Batteria di Test per l'esame dell'attenzione (TEA). Italian Edition by Pizzamiglio L, Zoccolotti P, Pittau PA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattioli, F., Stampatori, C., Righetti, F., Sala, E., Tomasi, C., & De Palma, G.
Affiliations
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
Corresponding author
Mattioli, Flavia
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2021-05-01
Volume
268
Issue
12
Pages
4422-4428
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W3158540423
Cited by
160
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 15
FWCI
17.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, neurological sequelae, cognitive impairment, long COVID, SARS-CoV-2, mild to moderate COVID-19, healthcare workers, neuropsychological assessment, anxiety, depression, stress, post-COVID-19 mental health
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Cognition, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review