Cited by 135Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringECG Monitoring and Analysis

Possibilities and limitations of the polar RS800 in measuring heart rate variability at rest

Wallén, Martin Benka, Hasson, Dan, Theorell, Töres, Canlon, Barbara, Osika, Walter·2012·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

A growing trend among clinical studies is the use of heart rate monitors (HRMs) for assessment of heart rate variability (HRV). These instruments offer a convenient alternative to traditional electrocardiographs (ECGs) for recording and processing of R-R data. Reports on the validity of such systems are, however, conflicting. This study aimed to assess the validity of a commercial HRM on a large study sample, with emphasis on gender and age. Simultaneous recordings of R-R intervals were conducted with the Polar RS800 HRM and a 3-lead ECG on 341 individuals. Data editing was performed with individually designated software for each instrument. Agreement on SDNN, RMSSD, and HF- and LF power was assessed with intraclass correlations (ICCs), standard errors of measurement (SEMs) and Bland and Altman plots. The HRM was not able to identify 18 observations with non-sinus beats. For men, agreement between instruments ranged from good to excellent (ICC ≥ 0.8) on all HRV measures, and SEMs were generally small. For women the results were weaker, with unacceptable agreement between instruments on SDNN. Women over 60 years did not reach a critical ICC value of 0.75 on any of the HRV measures. Bland and Altman plots demonstrated that the RS800 generally overestimated HRV, and that uncertainty increased with higher values. Since the Polar system did not identify errors satisfactorily, or return valid values of HRV for certain groups, it is concluded that, whenever possible, traditional ECGs should be used for both gathering and editing of HRV data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-011-2079-9

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A reported drawback in most ECG-based wearable devices that do not record standard ECG derivations is their inability to distinguish some arrhythmias and ectopic beats.

    “Lastly, a reported drawback in most ECG-based wearable devices that do not record standard ECG derivations is their inability to distinguish some arrhythmias and ectopic beats.90”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallén, M. B., Hasson, D., Theorell, T., Canlon, B., & Osika, W.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Osika, Walter
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2011-07-16
Volume
112
Issue
3
Pages
1153-1165
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2047003420
Cited by
135
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
heart rate variability, heart rate monitors, RR interval, electrocardiogram, measurement validity, sex differences, age differences, SDNN, RMSSD
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Rest, Weights and Measures, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review