Cited by 99Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentParasites and Host InteractionsHelminth infection and control

Murine filariasis: Interleukin 4 and interleukin 5 lead to containment of different worm developmental stages

Volkmann, Lars, Bain, Odile, Saeftel, Michael, Specht, Sabine, Fischer, Kerstin, Brombacher, Frank, Matthaei, Klaus I., Hoerauf, Achim·2003·Medical Microbiology and Immunology

Abstract

We compared the impact of IL-4 and IL-5 deficiency during the fully permissive infection of BALB/c mice with the rodent filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis. IL-5, in contrast to IL-4, is crucial for the containment of adult worms during short- and long-term infections. IL-5 KO mice allowed development of more larvae into adult worms and showed up to 200 times more adult worms persisting during chronic infection (day 60 until 200 post-infection). This increased persistence was accompanied by a reduction in inflammatory nodules around adult filariae. In contrast, adult worm survival and nodule formation did not differ between BALB/c wild-type mice and BALB/c IL-4 KO or BALB/c IL-4 receptor (IL-4R) alpha-chain KO mice. In both IL-4 and IL-5 KO mice microfilaraemia was greatly enhanced (160-fold) and prolonged compared to wild-type mice. This extent of susceptibility to microfilariae required the presence of adult worms in a full infection cycle since upon intraperitoneal injection of microfilariae alone they were removed from BALB/c, BALB/c IL-4 KO and BALB/c IL-4R alpha-chain KO mice with equivalent kinetics, and since microfilarial survival was only slightly increased in IL-5 KO mice (factor of 5 vs. factor of 160 in full infection). In conclusion, IL-4 and IL-5 dependent effector pathways operate against different stages of filarial worms, and IL-5 has a greater impact on parasite containment than IL-4.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00430-002-0155-9

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volkmann, L., Bain, O., Saeftel, M., Specht, S., Fischer, K., Brombacher, F., Matthaei, K. I., & Hoerauf, A.
Affiliations
  • Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hoerauf, Achim
Venue
Medical Microbiology and Immunology
Published
2003-02
Volume
192
Issue
1
Pages
23-31
ISSN
  • 0044-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 0300-8584
  • 1432-1831
OpenAlex
W210228093
Cited by
99
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Microbiology and Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
filariasis, Litomosoides sigmodontis, IL-4, IL-5, IL-4 receptor alpha, microfilaremia, inflammatory nodules, parasite immune evasion
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Eosinophils, Female, Filariasis, Filarioidea, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neutrophils, Signal Transduction, Interleukin-4, Interleukin-5, Receptors, Interleukin-4, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review