Cited by 24COVID-19 and healthcare impactsCOVID-19 and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and care

Take care or “German Angst”? Lessons from cancer care during COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020

Open access
Büntzel, Jens, Micke, Oliver, Klein, Michael, Büntzel, Judith, Walter, Stefanie, Keinki, Christian, Huebner, Jutta·2021·Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While the second wave of COVID-19 has started in Europe, data are still missing on the consequences of the first one for patients with cancer. The aim of our study was to learn more about the experiences of German patients and staff in the oncology services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted among cancer patients and their therapists (physicians, medical staff, psychologists, spiritual care givers) in Germany between April and May 2020 asking about burden, fears, and perceived changes in German oncology service system. Besides answer frequencies of different stakeholders, uni- and multivariate analyses were performed for selected items to identify areas of high impact. RESULTS: In total 752 participants were included. All groups have identified high mental burden as central problem. A majority was confused about varying information policies and strategies against the pandemic. Patient reported restricted visits, isolation and delay of treatment as central fears and problems. The majority of fears could be coped by the health care workers. The patients describe processes at the oncology services during the first wave. Personal experiences with COVID-19 have had no influence on the felt burden of the patients. Physicians, medical staff, psychologists and spiritual care givers were extremely stressed but repressed their own burden. They await financial, physical and mental problems for their own future. CONCLUSIONS: The presented personal views and experiences allow focusing the discussions about heath care systems during the on-going pandemic. Support for health care workers, as much routine as possible in oncology services, and transparency in information will be the keys for good management in futural situations of crisis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00432-020-03492-4

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 7 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Patients' personal experiences with COVID-19 did not influence their felt burden.

    “Personal experiences with COVID-19 have had no influence on the felt burden of the patients.”
    • Also stated in: § Focus cancer patients · plain
      “Personal contact to COVID-19-patients or own infection are not affecting this answers/impression regarding the pandemic situation at all.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    46 physicians (48.9%) anticipated negative physical and/or mental consequences for themselves after the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “46 (48.9%) anticipated negative physical and/or mental sequels for themself after the Covid-19 pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Patients with active cancer disease were more often concerned about ongoing treatments and organization of oncology services than survivors (p = 0.002).

    “Patients with active cancer disease were more often concerned regarding on-going treatments and organization of oncology services (p = 0.002) than survivors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    123 of 129 psychologists and spiritual care givers (95.3%) described prohibition of visits as one of the main problems for patients during the pandemic.

    “123/129 psychologists/spiritual care givers (95.3%) were describing prohibition of visits as one of the main problems for patients during the pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Professionals reported an increasing level of mental burden between the two survey points.

    “In contrast, professionals reported an increasing level of their mental burden (distress) between both points of survey (see Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • May combine two claims. 8
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Ninety-four physicians participated in the survey.

    “94 physicians haven taken part in our survey.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The survey program included 752 participants in total.

    “In total 752 participants were included.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Patients reported restricted visits, isolation, and delay of treatment as central fears and problems.

    “Patient reported restricted visits, isolation and delay of treatment as central fears and problems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    One hundred fifty-two psychologists and spiritual care givers participated in the survey.

    “One hundred and fifty-two participants took part in our survey for psychologists/spiritual care givers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Physicians, medical staff, psychologists, and spiritual care givers were extremely stressed but repressed their own burden.

    “Physicians, medical staff, psychologists and spiritual care givers were extremely stressed but repressed their own burden.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Seventy-three care givers participated in the medical staff survey.

    “73 care givers have taken part in this survey.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Four hundred thirty-three cancer patients completed the patient questionnaire.

    “Four hundred thirty-three participants completed the questionnaire.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Precipitous decisions based on these premonitions were reported, including no treatment, rejection of adjuvant therapy, therapy discontinuation, and therapy breaks.

    “Precipitous decisions, based on these premonitions are reported (no treatment, rejection of adjuvant therapy, therapy discontinuation, therapy breaks).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The majority of health care workers anticipated decreasing income and increasing individual physical or mental problems.

    “The majority of health care workers is awaiting decreasing income, increasing individual physical or mental problems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Patients' fears and premonitions included delay of diagnosis, isolation from family and friends, and other barriers to cancer, supportive, or social care.

    “Fears and premonitions of patients include delay of diagnosis, isolation from family and friends, other barriers to cancer, supportive or social care.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    During lockdown most support offers were closed, and even self-help groups did not meet.

    “During the lock down most offers of support were closed, even self-help groups did not meet”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Problems in communicating about COVID-19 exist worldwide independently of country and culture.

    “Nicola et al. described problems in communicating about COVID-19 around the world, which are existing independently from country and culture (Nicola et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nicola et al. 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Despite its drawbacks, the survey provides an authentic and wide-ranging image of the experiences and attitudes of actors in cancer care in April and May 2020.

    “Despite several drawbacks as the quickly developed and unvalidated instruments, online distribution via different organizations thus mainly recruiting selected and the special motivated participants, this is an authentic and wide-ranging image of the experiences and attitudes of the actors in cancer care, which reflects the impressions of the moment in April/May 2020.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    A principal component analysis underlines an eminent need for professional supervision.

    “An additional principal component analysis (Fig. 4) underlines the eminent need of a professional supervision (see view of psychologists on the others).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A more restrictive lockdown would break this coping system and remove these possibilities of coping.

    “A more restrictive lock down would break this system and avoid these possibilities of coping.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Confusion appears to be a phenomenon in crisis times.

    “Confusion seems to be a phenomenon in crisis times.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nicola et al. 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The external view of psychologists and spiritual care givers on medical professionals clearly underlines an impending collapse.

    “The external view of psychologists/spiritual care givers on the medical professionals clearly underlines this impending collapse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Heat maps are not a validated instrument for assessing mental stress.

    “Heat maps are no validated instrument to assess mental stress”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    A uniform warning from all professional groups warns against mental burden and the resulting danger for ongoing or future anti-cancer strategies.

    “A uniform warning from all professional groups warns against this mental burden and the resulting danger for ongoing or futural anti-cancer strategies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participation in an online survey probably selects participants who feel relatively well and are not overwhelmed by fears or have a poor disease course.

    “Yet, we have to realize, that most probably, taking part in an online survey selects participants who feel rather well and are not overwhelmed from fears or have a poor course of their disease.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    As growing numbers of nurses, physicians, and other care givers drop out due to exhaustion, illness, or burnout, stress on the remaining staff will increase, as already seen in structurally weaker regions.

    “With a growing number of nurses, physicians and other care givers dropping out of the system due to exhaustion, bodily or mental illness or burn-out, the stress on the remaining will even increase as already can be seen in structurally weaker regions (El-Hage et al. 2020; Petzold et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites El-Hage et al. 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Petzold et al. 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

21 of 21
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The presented survey dataset is the largest survey conducted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe.

    “With more than 750 patients and health care professionals participating in our online survey are, the here presented data set presents—to the best of our knowledge—the largest survey during the first wave of the pandemic in Europe.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Data on the consequences of the first COVID-19 wave for cancer patients are still missing.

    “While the second wave of COVID-19 has started in Europe, data are still missing on the consequences of the first one for patients with cancer.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The perspectives of all actors are necessary to complete the picture of experiences and emotions during the pandemic.

    “Accordingly, the perspective of all actors is necessary to complete the picture of experiences/emotions in the pandemic situation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Official statistics indicate sufficient resources, capacities, and fully running supply for cancer patients at university hospitals during COVID-19.

    “While the official statistics point to sufficient resources, capacities, and fully running supply for cancer patients at university hospitals during COVID-19, only few real world data exist on cancer care in other settings.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Distress comparison is assigned different time periods

    Minor

    The methods specify a comparison between weeks 16 and 17 of 2020, both in April. The results describe that distress comparison as occurring between April and May.

  • Daily-work impact percentage is understated

    Minor

    Among medical staff, 59 of 69 is 85.5%, not the reported 81.2%.

    Reported 81.2 · recomputed 85.507246

  • Percentage describing other professionals as heated is incorrect

    Minor

    The section says 128 participants answered this question; 87 of 128 is about 68.0%, not 62.5%.

    Reported 62.5 · recomputed 67.96875

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Büntzel, J., Micke, O., Klein, M., Büntzel, J., Walter, S., Keinki, C., & Huebner, J.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • Francis Hospital (DE)
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Büntzel, Jens
  • Büntzel, Judith
Venue
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Published
2021-01-02
Volume
147
Issue
7
Pages
2093-2105
ISSN
  • 0084-5353 (ISSN-L)
  • 0171-5216
  • 1432-1335
OpenAlex
W3114057928
Cited by
24
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, cancer care, psychological burden, fear, healthcare workers, patient experience, oncology services, treatment delay, isolation, information transparency, psychological support, Germany
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Delivery of Health Care, Germany, Health Personnel, Humans, Mental Health, Neoplasms, Patients, Surveys and Questionnaires, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review