Cited by 22COVID-19 and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and careCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

The psychosocial and emotional experiences of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

Open access
Muls, A., Georgopoulou, S., Hainsworth, E., Hartley, B., O'Gara, G., Stapleton, S., Cruickshank, S.·2022·Seminars in Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11th, 2020. Global social lockdowns were instigated to reduce spread and prevent health-services from becoming overwhelmed. People having treatment for cancer are known to have heightened psychological/emotional burden. The combined impact of managing pandemic regulations alongside this may present additional burden. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine current evidence of the psychological and emotional impact of COVID-19 on people with cancer, early in the pandemic. METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched (Embase, Global Health, HMIC, PsychINFO, CINAHL) from September 2019 to October 2021. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method primary research studies exploring emotional and psychological impacts of COVID-19 on cancer patients, limited to English language, were included. Quality appraisal was conducted using the MMAT. RESULTS: Fifty-one papers, with 27,356 people from 21 countries treated for cancer, were included. 43 studies were quantitative with a survey method approach, six studies qualitative and four used a mixed methods design. MMAT score was mostly two or three. Four themes were identified: Emotional aspects and Quality of Life; Psychosocial aspects; Impact of COVID-19 on self; Impact of COVID-19 on cancer, with themes overlapping. CONCLUSION: Whilst emotional/psychological impacts such as anxiety, isolation, employment fears, and uncertainty about the future were potentially universal concerns early in the pandemic, they may have been particularly acute for people living with cancer and represent complex, overlapping factors. As COVID-19 continues to impact health-services and society, it is important to focus on any ongoing impact to the experience of cancer patients. Most of the studies reviewed used tools that do not provide deeper understanding of how and why emotional states of people with cancer were affected. Further qualitative work may reveal patterns of what was unique to cancer patients during the pandemic, compared to general populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.08.001

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. COVID-10 rapid guideline: delivery of systemic anticancer treatments, http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng161. Accessed November 01, 2022 33497155
  2. [33]Noblit GW Hare RD. Chapter 5: meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies Peter Lang AG Counterpoints Vol. 44 1999 Particularities: Collected Essays on Ethnography and Education 93 123 http://www.jstor.org/stable/42975557

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muls, A., Georgopoulou, S., Hainsworth, E., Hartley, B., O'Gara, G., Stapleton, S., & Cruickshank, S.
Affiliations
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Muls, A.
Venue
Seminars in Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
371-382
ISSN
0093-7754 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292553244
Cited by
22
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Institute of Cancer Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, cancer patients, psychological impact, emotional burden, psychosocial impact, anxiety, social isolation, future uncertainty, quality of life, lockdown, cancer care
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Communicable Disease Control, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review