Cited by 45Palliative and Oncologic CareCancer survivorship and carePatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Feelings of oncology patients about being nursed in protective isolation as a consequence of cancer chemotherapy treatment

Campbell, Tanya·1999·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Feelings of oncology patients about being nursed in protective isolation as a consequence of cancer chemotherapy treatment This qualitative research explores the feelings of oncology patients nursed in protective isolation following high‐dose chemotherapy. Five patients described their feelings about the isolation experience during audio‐taped interviews lasting between a half and one hour. Tapes were transcribed and analysed, with emergent themes considered in relation to the other interviews and to the literature. The research findings indicate that cancer patients have specific concerns with regard to their experience in the isolation environment, which fall into four distinct categories of: ‘being shut in’; ‘coping with the experience’; ‘being alone’; and ‘maintaining contact with the outside world’. In addition, patients have concerns with regard to the experience of having cancer, that impinge upon the isolation experience. These are: ‘having cancer’; ‘suffering chemotherapy’; ‘knowing what to expect’; and ‘developing relationships with the health professionals’. The core variable is ‘something that I have to go through’. The nature of the relationship between the categories led to the development of an integrative model for exploring the feelings of cancer patients nursed in isolation. Most of the informants coped well with the isolation experience and described feeling supported by the nursing staff. Their overriding concern in fact, reflected a desire to receive information about their disease and reassurance regarding their treatment. Being in isolation appears to inhibit communication about these issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01099.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, T.
Affiliations
Bournemouth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Tanya
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-08
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
439-447
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2092340110
Cited by
45
References
28
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
protective isolation, cancer patients, high-dose chemotherapy, patient emotions, nurse-patient relationship, patient information needs, patient support, integrative model, health worker communication
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Antineoplastic Agents, England, Hodgkin Disease, Humans, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Patient Isolation, Professional-Patient Relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review