Cited by 32Dermatological diseases and infestationsVector-borne infectious diseasesHelminth infection and control

Evaluation of the efficacy of an imidacloprid 10% / moxidectin 1% spot-on against Otodectes cynotis in cats

Fourie, L. J., Kok, D. J., Heine, J.·2003·Parasitology Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00436-003-0906-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fourie, L. J., Kok, D. J., & Heine, J.
Affiliations
  • University of the Free State (ZA)
  • Clinvet (ZA)
  • Bayer (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Fourie, L. J.
Venue
Parasitology Research
Published
2003-07-01
Volume
90
Issue
0
Pages
S112-S113
ISSN
  • 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0113
  • 1432-1955
OpenAlex
W1995039761
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
Otodectes cynotis, ear mites, imidacloprid, moxidectin, spot-on formulation, topical acaricide, cats, treatment efficacy, cure rate
MeSH terms
Neonicotinoids, Animals, Cat Diseases, Cats, Drug Therapy, Combination, Imidazoles, Insecticides, Mite Infestations, Nitro Compounds, Treatment Outcome, Macrolides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review