Cited by 50Helminth infection and controlParasite Biology and Host InteractionsParasites and Host Interactions

Molecular identification of Trichuris vulpis and Trichuris suis isolated from different hosts

Cutillas, Cristina, de Rojas, Manuel, Ariza, Concepción, Ubeda, José Manuel, Guevara, Diego·2007·Parasitology Research

Abstract

Trichuris suis was isolated from the cecum of two different hosts (Sus scrofa domestica -- swine and Sus scrofa scrofa -- wild boar) and Trichuris vulpis from dogs in Sevilla, Spain. Genomic DNA was isolated and internal transcribed spacers (ITS)1-5.8S-ITS2 segment from the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) was amplified and sequenced using polymerase chain reaction techniques. The sequence of T. suis from both hosts was 1,396 bp in length while that of T. vulpis was 1,044 bp. ITS1 of both populations isolated of T. suis was 661 nucleotides in length, while the ITS2 was 534 nucleotides in length. Furthermore, the ITS1 of T. vulpis was 410 nucleotides in length, while the ITS2 was 433 nucleotides in length. One hundred fifty-four nucleotides were observed along the 5.8S gene of T. suis and T. vulpis. Intraindividual and intraspecific variations were detected in the rDNA of both species. The presence of microsatellites was observed in all the individuals assayed. Sequence analysis of the ITSs and the 5.8S gene has demonstrated no sequence differences between T. suis isolated from both hosts (S. scrofa domestica -- swine and S. scrofa scrofa -- wild boar). Nevertheless, clear differences were detected between the ITS1 and ITS2 of T. suis and T. vulpis. Furthermore, a comparative molecular analysis between both species and the previously published ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequence data of Trichuris ovis, Trichuris leporis, Trichuris muris, Trichuris arvicolae, and Trichuris skrjabini was carried out. A common homology zone was detected in the ITS1 sequence of all species of trichurids.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00436-006-0275-z

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cutillas, C., de Rojas, M., Ariza, C., Ubeda, J. M., & Guevara, D.
Affiliations
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Corresponding author
Cutillas, Cristina
Venue
Parasitology Research
Published
2006-09-27
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
383-389
ISSN
  • 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0113
  • 1432-1955
OpenAlex
W2024964594
Cited by
50
References
36
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
Keywords
Trichuris vulpis, Trichuris suis, ITS region, ribosomal DNA, microsatellite markers, host range, pigs, wild boar, dogs, Trichuris ovis, Trichuris muris, molecular identification
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Species Specificity, Swine, Swine Diseases, Trichuriasis, Trichuris, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA, Ribosomal Spacer, Sus scrofa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review