Cited by 23Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Canine dirofilariosis endemic in Central Europe—10 years of epidemiological study in Slovakia

Miterpáková, Martina, Iglódyová, Adriana, Čabanová, Viktória, Stloukal, Eduard, Miklisová, Dana·2016·Parasitology Research

Abstract

The study presents the comprehensive results of a detailed epidemiological study on canine dirofilariosis in Slovakia, Central Europe. More than 4000 dogs were investigated, and several epidemiological factors were considered. The mean prevalence in individual regions ranged from 2.0 % in northern Slovakia to more than 25.0 % in the south-western part of the country, with the nematode Dirofilaria repens confirmed as the dominant causative agent. Canine dirofilariosis occurred more often in animals more than 3 years old and in dogs of large and giant breed sizes. Short-haired animals were infected more often than dogs with a long coat. Also, the infection was significantly more prevalent in animals kept in rural areas in comparison with urban environments.Counts of microfilariae (mf) in peripheral blood reached their highest levels in May and August and corresponded to activity peaks and population maximums of potential vectors, the mosquito species Aedes vexans and Culex pipiens, the two most prevalent species in Slovakia. Moreover, two dogs naturally infested with D. repens were included in the experiment in order to monitor daily microfilarial periodicity. This fluctuation showed the same tendency in both animals, with a peak of circulating mf recorded at 4 a.m. and minimal mf counts at 4 p.m.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00436-016-4989-2

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miterpáková, M., Iglódyová, A., Čabanová, V., Stloukal, E., & Miklisová, D.
Affiliations
  • Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
  • Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Corresponding author
Čabanová, Viktória
Venue
Parasitology Research
Published
2016-03-28
Volume
115
Issue
6
Pages
2389-2395
ISSN
  • 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0113
  • 1432-1955
OpenAlex
W2318941904
Cited by
23
References
33
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Science Grant Agency VEGA (2/0018/16)
  • Application Centre for Protection of Humans, Animals and Plants against Parasites (ITMS: 26220220018)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
canine dirofilariasis, Dirofilaria repens, dogs, prevalence, risk factors, breed size, coat length, urban-rural differences, Aedes vexans, Culex pipiens, mosquito vectors, Slovakia
MeSH terms
Aedes, Animals, Culex, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Male, Microfilariae, Prevalence, Epidemiologic Studies, Slovakia, Endemic Diseases, Dirofilaria repens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review