Cited by 7Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenomics and Rare DiseasesFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

Heterozygous loss-of-function variants in DOCK4 cause neurodevelopmental delay and microcephaly

Open access
Herbst, Charlotte, Bothe, Viktoria, Wegler, Meret, Axer-Schaefer, Susanne, Audebert-Bellanger, Séverine, Gecz, Jozef, Cogne, Benjamin, Feldman, Hagit Baris +22 more·2024·Human Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Neurons form the basic anatomical and functional structure of the nervous system, and defects in neuronal differentiation or formation of neurites are associated with various psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Dynamic changes in the cytoskeleton are essential for this process, which is, inter alia, controlled by the dedicator of cytokinesis 4 ( DOCK4 ) through the activation of RAC1 . Here, we clinically describe 7 individuals (6 males and one female) with variants in DOCK4 and overlapping phenotype of mild to severe global developmental delay. Additional symptoms include coordination or gait abnormalities, microcephaly, nonspecific brain malformations, hypotonia and seizures. Four individuals carry missense variants (three of them detected de novo) and three individuals carry null variants (two of them maternally inherited). Molecular modeling of the heterozygous missense variants suggests that the majority of them affect the globular structure of DOCK4. In vitro functional expression studies in transfected Neuro-2A cells showed that all missense variants impaired neurite outgrowth. Furthermore, Dock4 knockout Neuro-2A cells also exhibited defects in promoting neurite outgrowth. Our results, including clinical, molecular and functional data, suggest that loss-of-function variants in DOCK4 probable cause a variable spectrum of a novel neurodevelopmental disorder with microcephaly.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Heterozygous loss-of-function and deleterious missense variants in DOCK4 were identified in seven individuals with variable neurodevelopmental delay, microcephaly, and coordination/gait abnormalities. Functional studies in Neuro-2A cells showed impaired neurite outgrowth for all tested missense variants and for Dock4 knockout, supporting DOCK4 as a probable monogenic cause of a neurodevelopmental disorder.

Key findings

  • Seven individuals (6 males, 1 female) with heterozygous DOCK4 variants had mild to severe developmental delay; additional features included coordination or gait abnormalities in 5/7, microcephaly in individuals 2 and 7 (OFC Z-scores −3.84 and −2), hypotonia, seizures, and nonspecific brain malformations in 4/6 who underwent MRI.
  • Ten clinically relevant DOCK4 variants were identified: seven missense and three null variants; three missense variants were de novo, two null variants were maternally inherited, and ACMG classification yielded three likely pathogenic and seven variants of uncertain significance.
  • Structural modeling suggested all missense variants destabilize the DOCK4 fold, and in vitro expression in Neuro-2A cells showed that all tested missense variants significantly impaired neurite outgrowth; Dock4 knockout clones also had significantly shorter total and longest neurites.
  • DOCK4 has reduced missense and null variation relative to its 1,966-amino-acid size (pLI = 1, Z score = 1.67), and the authors conclude that heterozygous null and deleterious missense variants in DOCK4 are a probable monogenic cause of a neurodevelopmental disorder with microcephaly.

Methods

  • Cohort ascertainment used matchmaking platforms, personal communication, and literature review; genotypic and detailed phenotypic information was obtained for eight individuals, seven of whom were included in the clinical description, and all underwent single or trio exome or genome sequencing with Sanger segregation where appropriate.
  • Variants were prioritized by gnomAD v4.0.0 allele frequency below 1%, in silico impact prediction (CADD, REVEL, MutPred2, MetaDome), and candidate gene involvement in neuronal processes; variants were classified using ACMG/ClinGen criteria.
  • Functional work used Neuro-2A cells transfected with wild-type or mutant DOCK4-mRFP plasmids, CRISPR-Cas9 Dock4 knockout clones, western blotting, and neurite outgrowth assays after 36 h in differentiation media; statistics used one-way ANOVA with Games–Howell post hoc tests.

Limitations

  • The paper states that comprehensive phenotypic information was unavailable for each individual, that using murine Neuro-2A cells to study human variants is a limitation, and that bi-allelic Dock4 knockout cells were analyzed while individuals 5–7 carry heterozygous null variants.
  • The paper also states that replication with larger cohorts is necessary and that sex-dependent variable expressivity needs confirmation in a larger cohort with detailed segregation information.
  • Evident from the text: the clinical cohort is small (seven individuals), inheritance was unknown or not fully segregating for some cases, and one fetal case with compound heterozygous missense variants was excluded from the clinical description because inheritance was inconsistent with the rest of the cohort.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00439-024-02655-4

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

17 of 25 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Loss of DOCK4 function is compensated by overexpression of the DOCK4 interacting partner RAC1, as demonstrated in vitro and in vivo.

    “loss of DOCK4 function is compensated by overexpression of the DOCK4 interacting partner RAC1, as demonstrated in vitro (Huang et al. 2019) and in vivo (Guo et al. 2021)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Huang et al. 2019 source
    • cites Guo et al. 2021 source
  • Premisecitation

    DOCK4 is the only member of the DOCK family that is capable of activating RAP1.

    “DOCK4 is the only member of the DOCK family that is capable of activating RAP1 (Yajnik et al. 2003; Shi 2013)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Yajnik et al. 2003 source

      The Results report that wild-type DOCK4 activated Rap GTPase more than fivefold in transfected cells, supporting its ability to activate Rap1. The paper contrasts DOCK4 with family members associated with Rac signaling, but does not establish that no other DOCK family member can activate Rap1. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Shi 2013 source
  • Findingcitation

    The DOCK4 C terminus (1962KVSQL1966) matches the [RK]-x-[ST] consensus pattern present in a class of known PDZ ligands.

    “Although the exact role of individual amino acids within this motif has not been experimentally addressed to date, the DOCK4 C terminus (1962KVSQL1966) matches the [RK]-x-[ST] consensus pattern present in a class of known PDZ ligands (Tonikian et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tonikian et al. 2008 source
  • Premisecitation

    Relevant effects could be concealed by the analysis of differentiated cells, compared to effects that take place mostly during early development, as demonstrated in heterozygous Cux+/− mice.

    “relevant effects could be concealed by the analysis of differentiated cells, compared to effects that take place mostly during early development, as demonstrated in heterozygous Cux+/− mice (Oppermann et al. 2023)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Oppermann et al. 2023 source

      The Results section (Analysis of Cux1 heterozygous mice; page unavailable) reports reduced CUX1 immunoreactivity at P10 but no significant difference at P30, supporting the possibility that a later-stage analysis could miss an earlier difference. It does not establish that relevant effects occur mostly during early development or that analysis of differentiated cells generally conceals them; western blots found reduced p200 CUX1 at all tested ages. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Dock4 knockout Neuro-2A cells (clones ko1, ko2a and ko2b) had significantly shorter neurites (total and longest) compared to control and wild-type cells.

    “The neurite outgrowth assay demonstrated that the different knockout clones ko1, ko2a and ko2b cells had significant shorter neurites (total and longest neurite length) compared to control and wild-type cells (Fig. 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 15
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    DOCK4 has a reduced amount of missense and null variants compared to its size of 1,966 amino acids (pLI = 1, Z score = 1.67) in a population without severe, early-onset phenotypes, indicating a mild constraint.

    “Based on gnomAD (Karczewski et al. 2020), DOCK4 has a reduced amount of missense and null variants compared to its size of 1,966 amino acids (pLI = 1, Z score = 1.67) in a population without severe, early-onset phenotypes, indicating a mild constraint.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Karczewski et al. 2020 source

      The LoF intolerance of human genes section describes using gnomAD to identify genes depleted of predicted loss-of-function variants, and Additional information says individuals with severe pediatric disease were excluded. However, the passages found do not give DOCK4’s variant counts, protein length, pLI, or missense Z score, so they do not establish the claimed mild constraint for that gene. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    DHR2 is responsible for binding and activation of RAC1.

    “the latter is responsible for binding and activation of RAC1 (Shi 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shi 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Interaction of the proline-rich C terminus of DOCK4 with cortactin is important for dendritic spine formation.

    “and interaction with the proline-rich C terminus with cortactin for dendritic spine formation (Ueda et al. 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ueda et al. 2013 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    All variants in DOCK4 were classified according to ACMG criteria and ClinGen recommendations.

    “All variants in DOCK4 are described with regard to the human reference genome version GRCh38 and to the transcript NM_014705.4 and have been classified according to the criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) (Richards et al. 2015) and the recommendations of the Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group (ClinGen).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Richards et al. 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Bi-allelic null variants in DOCK6 cause Adams-Oliver syndrome.

    “bi-allelic null variants in DOCK6 (MIM: #614,219) and DOCK7 (MIM: #615,859), members of the dedicator of cytokinesis (DOCK) family, are a cause for the Adams–Oliver syndrome (Sukalo et al. 2015) and epileptic encephalopathy (Perrault et al. 2014), respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sukalo et al. 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several disease-causing genes remain undiscovered.

    “Although the rate of discovery of new rare disease–gene associations has declined in recent years (Ehrhart et al. 2021), several disease-causing genes remain undiscovered, as demonstrated by a recent analysis of the X chromosome (Leitão et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leitão et al. 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Wiltrout et al. reported three individuals with developmental delay, hypotonia, coordination or gait abnormalities and bi-allelic variants in DOCK3.

    “Furthermore, Wiltrout et al. reported three individuals with DD, hypotonia, coordination or gait abnormalities and bi-allelic variants in DOCK3 (MIM: #618,292) (Wiltrout et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wiltrout et al. 2019 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    All variants were prioritized considering allele frequency in gnomAD v4.0.0 below 1%, impact on protein function via different in silico programs, and involvement of candidate genes in neuronal processes.

    “All variants were prioritized considering allele frequency in gnomAD v4.0.0 (Karczewski et al. 2020) below 1%, impact on protein function via different in silico programs (CADD (Rentzsch et al. 2021), REVEL (Ioannidis et al. 2016), MutPred2 (Pejaver et al. 2020) and Metadome (Wiel et al. 2019)) and involvement of candidate genes in neuronal processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Karczewski et al. 2020 source

      The Discussion identifies gnomAD as a resource for allele-frequency estimates, supporting its use for that purpose. But Data availability specifies that this paper provides gnomAD 2.1.1, not the cited v4.0.0. The below-1% cutoff is the citing authors’ prioritization criterion, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Rentzsch et al. 2021 source
    • cites Ioannidis et al. 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The approach of using Neuro-2A cells to validate the impact of missense variants associated with human disorders is still being used successfully in recent studies.

    “this approach is still being used successfully in recent studies to validate the impact of missense variants associated with human disorders (Cioclu et al. 2023)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cioclu et al. 2023 source

      The Methods (page unavailable) and Results, ‘Functional Analysis of KCNT2 Channels Carrying Disease-Causing Variants’ (page unavailable), describe testing disorder-associated variants in cultured cells and finding functional effects. But the cells were HEK-293 and SH-SY5Y, not Neuro-2A, so the paper does not support the claim about continued use of Neuro-2A cells. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The proline-rich C terminus of DOCK4 is required for dendritic spine formation via interaction with cortactin.

    “Ueda et al. (2013) demonstrated that proline-rich C terminus of DOCK4 is required for dendritic spine formation via interaction with cortactin”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ueda et al. (2013) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Seizures occurred in the cohort: individual 1 had focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, and individual 7 had an abnormal EEG consistent with a focal onset seizure.

    “Individual 1 had focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures, and individual 7 had an abnormal EEG that is consistent with a focal onset seizure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Behavioral abnormalities included autism or autistic behavior in individuals 4 and 5, and attention disorder and anxiety in individual 6.

    “Behavioral abnormalities were less common, with a diagnosis of autism or autistic behavior in individuals 4 and 5, and attention disorder and anxiety in individual 6.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both Dock4 knockout and the missense variants investigated resulted in impaired function in promoting neurite outgrowth in Neuro-2A cells.

    “both Dock4 knockout and the missense variants investigated resulted in impaired function in promoting neurite outgrowth in Neuro-2A cells”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two null variants in DOCK4 were maternally inherited, and the inheritance of the null variant in individual 6 is unknown.

    “Two null variants were maternally inherited, and the inheritance of the null variant of individual 6 is unknown (Fig. 1B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Six individuals underwent MRI and four had nonspecific brain abnormalities.

    “Six individuals underwent MRI and four had nonspecific brain abnormalities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In p.Ile1067Thr, the isoleucine is replaced by a shorter threonine, resulting in a loss of hydrophobic interactions with Val1106 and Lys1109.

    “In the p.Ile1067Thr variant, the isoleucine is replaced by a shorter threonine. This results in a loss of hydrophobic interactions with Val1106 and Lys1109 (Fig. 2D, E).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The variants p.Lys1962Asn and p.Val1042Ala were detected in gnomAD once, and p.Pro253Leu and p.Val420Met had allele frequencies of 0.061% and 0.00186%, respectively.

    “The variants p.Lys1962Asn and p.Val1042Ala were detected in gnomAD once, and the two inherited missense variants p.Pro253Leu and p.Val420Met (detected compound heterozygous with the variant p.Val1042Ala) were observed with an allele frequency of 0.061% and 0.00186% in gnomAD, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The AlphaFold-2 model of DOCK4 is reliable for residues 1-1587, whereas low confidence scores for residues 1588-1966 suggest that the C terminus is disordered and lacks a defined three-dimensional structure.

    “Inspection of the AlphaFold scores indicates a reliable model for residues 1–1587, whereas the low confidence scores for residues 1588–1966 suggest that the C terminus is disordered and lacks a defined three-dimensional structure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Minor facial dysmorphisms were reported for four individuals (2, 4, 5 and 7), with no apparent shared facial gestalt.

    “Although minor facial dysmorphisms have been reported for four individuals (individuals 2, 4, 5 and 7), there was no apparent shared facial gestalt (Table S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Two compound heterozygous missense variants in DOCK4 were identified in a fetus with microcephaly, rhombencephalosynapsis and microlissencephaly.

    “It should be noted that we also identified two compound heterozygous missense variants in a fetus with microcephaly, rhombencephalosynapsis and microlissencephaly (Table S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    No functional role can be assigned to Pro1733, suggesting that the p.Pro1733Ala exchange does not critically affect DOCK4 function.

    “In contrast, no functional role can be assigned to Pro1733, suggesting that the p.Pro1733Ala exchange (rs150569245, detected with a frequency of 1.163% in gnomAD) does not critically affect DOCK4 function.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Disease-causing variants in genes involved in cytoskeletal regulation, such as RHOA, CDC42 and RAC1, are associated with a neurodevelopmental disorder.

    “Disease-causing variants in genes that are involved in this process, such as RHOA (MIM: #618,727), CDC42 (MIM: #616,737) and RAC1 (MIM: #617,751), are associated with a NDD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites MIM: #618,727

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites MIM: #616,737

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites MIM: #617,751

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All sequences were verified by Sanger sequencing.

    “All sequences were verified by Sanger sequencing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The formation and function of dendrites and neurites are highly dependent on dynamic changes in the cytoskeleton that are regulated by small GTPases.

    “The formation and function of dendrites and neurites are highly dependent on dynamic changes in the cytoskeleton that are regulated by small GTPases (Nimchinsky et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nimchinsky et al. 2002 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    DOCK4-dependent RAC1 activation is important for neurite differentiation.

    “The DOCK4-dependent RAC1 activation has been reported as important for neurite differentiation (Xiao et al. 2013)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Xiao et al. 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Sanger sequencing was used for segregation analysis where appropriate.

    “Maternity and paternity were confirmed for all individuals, and Sanger sequencing was used for segregation analysis where appropriate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    At least 70 cells per group were analyzed in each neurite outgrowth experiment.

    “At least 70 cells/group were analyzed in each experiment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The result of each neurite outgrowth assay per group was confirmed by at least two individual experiments.

    “The result of each assay per group was confirmed by at least two individual experiments, and representative data are shown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The paternally inherited variant p.Pro253Leu was detected together with the de novo variant p.Met1044Thr in individual 2; phasing was not possible, but it is more likely that the de novo variant is also located on the paternal allele (in cis).

    “It should be noted that the paternally inherited variant p.Pro253Leu was detected together with the de novo variant p.Met1044Thr in individual 2. Unfortunately, phasing of the de novo variant was not possible, but it is more likely that this variant is also located on the paternal allele (i.e., in cis) (Jónsson et al. 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jónsson et al. 2017 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Dysregulation of guanine nucleotide exchange factors that regulate RAC1 activity is associated with developmental delay/intellectual disability.

    “In addition, dysregulation of guanine nucleotide exchange factors that regulate RAC1 activity is also associated with DD/ID.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    In silico structural modeling suggests a loss-of-function mechanism for the missense variants, comparable to the mechanism for the null variants.

    “our in silico structural modeling suggests a loss-of-function mechanism for the missense variants, which is a comparable mechanism for the null variants”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Bi-allelic null variants in DOCK7 cause epileptic encephalopathy.

    “bi-allelic null variants in DOCK6 (MIM: #614,219) and DOCK7 (MIM: #615,859), members of the dedicator of cytokinesis (DOCK) family, are a cause for the Adams–Oliver syndrome (Sukalo et al. 2015) and epileptic encephalopathy (Perrault et al. 2014), respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Perrault et al. 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Maternity and paternity were confirmed for all individuals.

    “Maternity and paternity were confirmed for all individuals, and Sanger sequencing was used for segregation analysis where appropriate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    SHSY5Y is derived from neuroblastoma and is therefore also a limitation to investigate NDD.

    “this cell line is also derived from neuroblastoma and is therefore also a limitation to investigate NDD”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The human DOCK4 sequence is highly conserved, with 98.18% protein sequence similarity to murine Dock4.

    “we used the human DOCK4 sequence, which is highly conserved (98.18%% protein sequence similarity to murine Dock4)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The use of a murine neuroblastoma cell line (Neuro-2A) to study the effect of variants identified in humans is a limitation.

    “the use of a murine neuroblastoma cell line (Neuro-2A) to study the effect of variants identified in humans is also a limitation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Another limitation of the present study is the analysis of bi-allelic Dock4 KO cells, while individuals 5-7 carry heterozygous null variants.

    “Another limitation of the present study is the analysis of bi-allelic Dock4 KO cells, while individuals 5–7 carry heterozygous null variants”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A limitation of the study is the unavailability of comprehensive phenotypic information for each individual.

    “A limitation of the study is the unavailability of comprehensive phenotypic information for each individual”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The genetic background of the murine Neuro-2A cell line is different from human.

    “the genetic background is indeed different”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
39 of 39
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The three identified null variants lead to mRNA degradation by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, causing haploinsufficiency.

    “For the three identified null variants, it can be assumed that the mRNA is degraded by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (Lindeboom et al. 2016) causing haploinsuffuciency.”
1 of 1

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Control variant is named both p.Arg853Leu and p.Arg853His

    Minor

    The Results text calls the positive-control variant p.Arg853Leu, while the Fig. 3 caption calls it p.Arg853His.

  • Variant of unknown inheritance is called inherited

    Minor

    The genetic findings include p.Arg924* among the inherited null variants, although Table 1 lists its inheritance as unknown (not maternal).

  • Individual 5's microcephaly is omitted from the clinical description

    Minor

    The clinical description identifies individuals 2 and 7 as having microcephaly, whereas Table 1 marks individual 5 as having it.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herbst, C., Bothe, V., Wegler, M., Axer-Schaefer, S., Audebert-Bellanger, S., Gecz, J., Cogne, B., Feldman, H. B., Horn, A. H. C., Hurst, A. C. E., Kelly, M. A., Kruer, M. C., Kurolap, A., Laquerriere, A., Li, M., Mark, P. R., Morawski, M., Nizon, M., Pastinen, T., Polster, T., Saugier-Veber, P., SeSong, J., Sticht, H., Stieler, J. T., Thifffault, I., van Eyk, C. L., Marcorelles, P., Vezain-Mouchard, M., Abou Jamra, R., & Oppermann, H.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology (US)
  • Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
  • Invitae (United States) (US)
  • Helen DeVos Children's Hospital (US)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Children's Mercy Hospital (US)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (FR)
Corresponding author
Oppermann, Henry
Venue
Human Genetics
Published
2024-03
Volume
143
Issue
3
Pages
455-469
ISSN
  • 0018-7348 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-6717
  • 1432-1203
OpenAlex
W4393161576
Cited by
7
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PUBLISSO (German National Library of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universität Leipzig
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
DOCK4, neurodevelopmental delay, microcephaly, loss-of-function mutations, missense mutations, de novo mutations, maternally inherited variant, Rac1, neurite outgrowth, cytoskeleton, neurodevelopmental disorders, seizures, hypotonia, brain malformations
MeSH terms
Loss of Function Mutation, Adolescent, Animals, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Infant, Male, Microcephaly, Phenotype, Mutation, Missense, GTPase-Activating Proteins, Mice, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review