CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 254Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePain Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Entwicklung und empirische �berpr�fung des Deutschen Schmerzfragebogens der DGSS

Nagel, B., Gerbershagen, H. U., Lindena, G., Pfingsten, M.·2002·Der Schmerz
DOI 10.1007/s00482-002-0162-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The German pain questionnaire (DSF) has been developed and validated by the Task force on "Standardization and Economy in Pain Management" of the German Chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain (DGSS). The concept of the DSF is based on a bio (medical) - psycho - social pain model. The modular approach to pain assessment consists of:demographic data,pain variables (e. g. pain sites, temporal characteristics, duration, intensity),pain associated symptoms,affective and sensory qualities of pain (adjective list by Geissner, SESCopyright ),pain relieving and intensifying factors,previous pain treatment procedures,pain-related disability (Pain Disability Index by Tait et al.),depression test CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Test),comorbid conditions,social factors (educational level, occupation, retirement status, compensation and/or litigation status, disability for work),health related quality of life (SF-36Copyright ). Practicability and content validity were tested in some 3000 patients. Comparison with external criteria (e. g. medical and psychiatric-psychological diagnoses, physician-determined chronicity of pain) proved good content validity and excellent reliability of patients statements in the questionnaire. The great majority of patients stated that the DSF covered their pain history completely and in an orderly fashion. Difficulty to answer the questions was considered low. The German pain questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for recording the multidimensional experience of pain. Data from such questionnaires are indispensable for follow-up studies and internal and external quality assessments. The DSF can be ordered from the German Society for the Study of Pain (www.dgss.org) and is a core instrument of the computer program "quality assurance in pain management" (QUAST) of this society.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00482-002-0162-1

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 20 references

2 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 251

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nagel, B., Gerbershagen, H. U., Lindena, G., & Pfingsten, M.
Affiliations
  • RedCLARA (UY)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
ORCID
Venue
Der Schmerz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
263-270
ISSN
  • 0932-433X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2129
DOI
10.1007/s00482-002-0162-1
OpenAlex
W11504318
Cited by
254
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Der Schmerz (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
pain assessment, questionnaire development, content validity, reliability statistics, pain-related disability, pain-related depression, pain-related anxiety, pain-related hopelessness, pain-related guilt, pain-related shame, pain-related helplessness, chronic pain, screening tool
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Germany, Humans, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review