Cited by 43Cancer survivorship and careErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentFrailty in Older Adults

Cancer-related fatigue: clinical practice versus practice guidelines

Open access
Hilarius, Doranne L., Kloeg, Paul H., van der Wall, Elsken, Komen, Manon, Gundy, Chad M., Aaronson, Neil K.·2011·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated adherence to treatment guidelines on cancer-related anaemia and fatigue (CRA/CRF) and factors influencing the choice of intervention. METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, 136 cancer patients being treated with chemotherapy in a large community hospital completed a questionnaire at consecutive outpatient visits assessing fatigue (the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) and fatigue-related counselling and advice received. Data on administration of chemotherapy and use of epoetin or blood transfusions were abstracted from the medical records. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of patients with severe anaemia (Hb < 10 g/dl) and 6% of patients with less severe anaemia (Hb levels 10-12 g/dl) received treatment (epoetin and/or blood transfusions). Half of the patients with less severe anaemia reported clinically relevant levels of fatigue. More than 50% of all patients received fatigue-related counselling, primarily at the start of chemotherapy. Most counselling was directed at energy conservation. Fatigue was not associated significantly with the use of epoetin or blood transfusion. Patients receiving palliative treatment (17%), male patients (16%) and patients with a low Hb level (<6.2 g/dl, 38%) were treated significantly more often with epoetin. CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, guidelines concerning the use of epoetin or blood transfusion in severe CRA are adhered to in about half of the cases. In patients with less severe anaemia, the level of fatigue did not play a significant role in the use of epoetin. According to current guidelines, counselling on CRF should be directed primarily at activity enhancement. However, only a minority of patients receive such counselling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-010-0848-3

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only 14-27% of survivors received advice on management of fatigue, most directed at conserving energy (26-65%).

    “Only 14-27% of survivors received advice on the management of fatigue, most of which was directed at conserving energy (26-65%) [27].”

    From Empowerment in the treatment of fatigue in breast cancer patients (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Discussion reports that previous studies found 14–27% of cancer patients received fatigue treatment or advice; it does not describe that group as survivors. In this paper’s Results (Counselling for fatigue, Table 6), 26% of fatigued patients and 65% of non-fatigued patients received energy-conservation counselling, while 63% received fatigue counselling overall. The sentence combines figures from different groups as though they describe the same survivors. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hilarius, D. L., Kloeg, P. H., van der Wall, E., Komen, M., Gundy, C. M., & Aaronson, N. K.
Affiliations
  • Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Medisch Centrum Alkmaar (NL)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Aaronson, Neil K.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2010-03-19
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
531-538
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W1983173150
Cited by
43
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
cancer-related fatigue, cancer-related anemia, epoetin, blood transfusion, guideline adherence, chemotherapy-induced anemia, energy conservation, palliative care, hemoglobin levels
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anemia, Antineoplastic Agents, Blood Transfusion, Erythropoietin, Fatigue, Female, Hospitals, Community, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review