Cited by 895Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Cancer-related fatigue: the scale of the problem

Open access
Hofman, Maarten, Ryan, Julie L., Figueroa-Moseley, Colmar D., Jean-Pierre, Pascal, Morrow, Gary R.·2007·The Oncologist

Abstract

Fatigue is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms experienced by patients with cancer. Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is characterized by feelings of tiredness, weakness, and lack of energy, and is distinct from the "normal" drowsiness experienced by healthy individuals in that it is not relieved by rest or sleep. It occurs both as a consequence of the cancer itself and as a side effect of cancer treatment, although the precise underlying pathophysiology is largely unknown. CRF may be an early symptom of malignant disease and is reported by as many as 40% of patients at diagnosis. Virtually all patients expect fatigue from cancer therapy. Up to 90% of patients treated with radiation and up to 80% of those treated with chemotherapy experience fatigue. CRF continues for months and even years ollowing completion of treatment in approximately one third of the patients with cancer. The impact of CRF on a patient's quality of life (QoL), particularly in relation to physical functioning and the ability to perform activities of daily living, is both profound and pervasive. In addition, CRF is associated with considerable psychological distress and can impose a significant financial burden by limiting a patient's ability to work. These effects can extend to caregivers and family members, who may also have to reduce their working capacity in order to provide additional care for a patient with CRF. This paper examines the prevalence of CRF and explores the impact of this distressing symptom on patients' functioning and QoL. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/theoncologist.12-s1-4

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Mock V, At k inson A, Ba rsevick A et a l. NCCN P ractice Guidel ines for Cancer-Related Fatigue. Oncology (Williston Park) 2000;14:151-161.
  2. Hof m a n M, Mor row GR , Rosco e JA et a l. Ca nc er pat ient s' exp e ct at ions of exper ienci ng t reat ment-related side ef fe cts: A Un iversit y of Roches- ter Cancer Center-Community Clinical Oncology Program study of 938 patients from community practices. Cancer 2004;101:851-857.
  3. Monga U, Kerrigan AJ, Thornby J et al. Prospective study of fatigue in localized prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol Investig 1999;7:178-185.
  4. Curt GA, Breitbart W, Cella D et al. Impact of cancer-related fatigue on the lives of patients: New findings from the Fatigue Coalition. In: Marty M, Pecorelli S, eds. Fatigue and Cancer. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2001:3-16.
  5. Monga U, Kerrigan AJ, Thornby J et al. Longitudinal study of quality of l i fe i n pat ient s w it h lo ca l i z e d prost at e ca nc er u ndergoi ng r a d iot her apy. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:391-399.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hofman, M., Ryan, J. L., Figueroa-Moseley, C. D., Jean-Pierre, P., & Morrow, G. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • a Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, Rochester, New York, USA
Corresponding author
Ryan, Julie L.
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
12
Issue
S1
Pages
4-10
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W2150471053
Cited by
895
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 49
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Oncologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NCI (1R25-CA102618-01A1, 2U10 CA037420-20)
  • American Cancer Society (RSG01071-01-PBP)
  • Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cancer-related fatigue, prevalence, quality of life, physical function, activities of daily living, psychological distress, financial burden, work disability, caregiver burden, chemotherapy side effects, radiotherapy complications, tumor pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Fatigue, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review