Cited by 442Cancer survivorship and carePosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Post-traumatic stress disorder and cancer

Open access
Cordova, Matthew J, Riba, Michelle B, Spiegel, David·2017·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

Being diagnosed with and treated for cancer is highly stressful and potentially traumatic. An extensive literature has evaluated the prevalence, predictors, and correlates of cancer-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and diagnoses. In this qualitative review of cancer-related PTSD literature, we highlight conceptual, methodological, and diagnostic issues, and identify clinical implications and areas for future research. Cancer-related PTSD has been documented in a minority of patients with cancer and their family members, is positively associated with other indices of distress and reduced quality of life, and has several correlates and risk factors (eg, prior trauma history, pre-existing psychiatric conditions, poor social support). The literature on treatment of cancer-related PTSD is sparse. Existing literature on cancer-related PTSD has used DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria; the revised DSM-5 PTSD criteria have important implications for the assessment of cancer-related distress. Application of PTSD diagnosis to patients with cancer has been critiqued on conceptual and methodological grounds, and important differential diagnosis considerations should be taken into account. Psychosocial assessment of patients with cancer should include careful evaluation of pre-cancer diagnosis trauma and psychiatric history, and diagnostic interviewing should consider concurrent conditions (eg, adjustment disorder). Treatment of cancer-related PTSD should be approached with caution and be informed by existing evidence-based approaches for traumatic stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30014-7

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cancer experience often includes a succession of multiple stressful and potentially traumatic events, namely diagnosis, treatment and post-treatment/survivorship stages, which may be exacerbated by precancer psychological vulnerabilities.

    “Cancer experience thus often includes a succession of multiple stressful and potentially traumatic events, namely diagnosis, treatment and post- treatment/survivorship stages (Cordova et al., 2017), which may be exacerbated by precancer psychological vulnerabilities (Connolly,2016).”
  • Cancer diagnosis and treatment have been conceptualized as traumatic stressors.

    “Cancer diagnosis and treatment have been conceptualized as traumatic stressors [7]”
  • This patient population may be especially sensitive to the benefits of mindfulness and adverse effects of experiential avoidance.

    “Considering Cordova's framework of cancer as a traumatic stressor [7] in the context of this intensive, high-risk treatment suggests that this patient population may be especially sensitive to the benefits of mindfulness and adverse effects of experiential avoidance.”
  • Considering the framework of cancer and treatment as a traumatic stressor, this type of approach to the painful and difficult internal experiences that inevitably occur may foster resilience.

    “Considering the framework of cancer and treatment as a traumatic stressor [7], this type of approach to the painful and difficult internal experiences that inevitably occur may foster resilience.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4 Text Revision Washington, DC American Psychiatric Association Press 2000
  2. [5]Cordova MJ Andrykowski MA Responses to cancer: posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry 2003 8 286 96 14613054

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cordova, M. J., Riba, M. B., & Spiegel, D.
Affiliations
  • Palo Alto University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Spiegel, David
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
330-338
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2577877919
Cited by
442
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 8
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U01CA197282)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
PTSD diagnostic criteria, DSM-5 PTSD criteria, psychosocial distress, quality of life, social support, psychiatric comorbidity, adjustment disorder, PTSD treatment, relatives of cancer patients
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Comorbidity, Causality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review