Cited by 17Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Forming new habits in the face of chronic cancer-related fatigue: An interpretative phenomenological study

Open access
Bootsma, Tom I., Schellekens, Melanie P. J., van Woezik, Rosalie A. M., Slatman, Jenny, van der Lee, Marije L.·2021·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose: The growing group of patients who suffer from chronic cancer-related fatigue (CCRF) after cancer have helpful and less helpful ways of responding to this long-lasting and disruptive problem. This qualitative study aimed to gain insight in essential elements of how patients respond to CCRF, with a focus on helpful responses to facilitate adaptation. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 25 participants who experienced severe CCRF for at least 3 months. Participants were recruited via media, patient associations, meetings, and health professionals until data saturation was attained. We used a topic guide with open-ended questions about lived experiences. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used for analysis of the transcripts. Results: We identified five interrelated themes of how patients respond to CCRF: (1) discovering physical and emotional boundaries; (2) communicating support needs; (3) reorganizing and planning activities and rest; (4) letting go of one’s habitual identity; and (5) recognizing and accepting CCRF. Conclusion: This study highlights the development of new habits and positive beliefs in the face of CCRF and the importance of (social) support in this process. This experiential knowledge on helpful responses can be used to inform patients and their significant others and improve self-efficacy. Health professionals could use these insights to improve recognition of CCRF and personalize treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-021-06252-3

Cites

47 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients who are more accepting of their CRF show lower fatigue levels, suggesting acceptance may protect against fatigue persistence.

    “Regarding protective factors, patients who are more accepting of their CRF show lower fatigue levels, suggesting that acceptance may protect patients from fatigue persistence.4,6,13”

    From Exploring the dynamic interconnectedness of protective and perpetuating factors of cancer-related fatigue (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion (Clinical implications and future research; page unavailable) reports an association between acceptance of present-moment experiences and lower fatigue in hematological cancer patients. The Results (Responses to CCRF; page unavailable) discuss accepting chronic cancer-related fatigue, but this study does not show that patients who accept their fatigue have lower fatigue levels or that acceptance protects against its persistence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The EMA protocol Energy InSight was developed based on quantitative and qualitative research findings, CRF literature, and clinical expertise.

    “Based on our quantitative (i.e., cross-sectional group-level network analysis) and qualitative research findings (i.e., metaethnography), the CRF literature, and our clinical expertise, we developed the EMA protocol Energy InSight. 6,13,20”

    From Exploring the dynamic interconnectedness of protective and perpetuating factors of cancer-related fatigue (2023) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Methods (Data-analysis; page unavailable) describe qualitative findings from interpretative phenomenological analysis, and the Discussion (Clinical implications and future research; page unavailable) suggests experience sampling as a future method. The paper does not report a metaethnography or say that its findings, CRF literature, and clinical expertise were used to develop the Energy InSight EMA protocol. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Allowing oneself to rest may be a behavioral mechanism promoting adaptive functioning in the face of CRF, as patients often report coping by pacing and balancing activity and rest.

    “Allowing oneself to rest may be another behavioral mechanism promoting adaptive functioning in the face of CRF, as patients often report that they cope with their fatigue by pacing themselves and by balancing activity and rest.6,11”
  • Previous findings indicated that cancer patients take more time to rest when they feel more fatigued.

    “Indeed, previous findings indicated that cancer patients take more time to rest when they feel more fatigued.6”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bootsma, T. I., Schellekens, M. P. J., van Woezik, R. A. M., Slatman, J., & van der Lee, M. L.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Bootsma, Tom I.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2021-05-06
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
6651-6659
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W3157881121
Cited by
17
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • KWF Kankerbestrijding (10761)
  • Maarten van der Weijden Foundation (10761)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
coping strategies, habit formation, lived experience, social support, acceptance, self-efficacy, personal transformation, emotional boundaries
MeSH terms
Fatigue, Habits, Humans, Neoplasms, Social Support, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review