Cited by 24Nursing care and researchPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Identifying the prevalence of unmet supportive care needs among family caregivers of cancer patients: an Italian investigation on home palliative care setting

Zavagli, Veronica, Raccichini, Melania, Ostan, Rita, Ercolani, Giacomo, Franchini, Luca, Varani, Silvia, Pannuti, Raffaella·2022·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose Family caregivers (FCs) are crucial resources in caring for cancer patients at home. The aim of this investigation was (1) to measure the prevalence of unmet needs reported by FCs of cancer patients in home palliative care, and (2) to investigate whether their needs change as their socio-demographic characteristics and the patients' functional abilities change. Methods FCs completed a battery of self-report questionnaires, including the Cancer Caregiving Tasks, Consequences, and Needs (CaTCoN). Results Data were collected from 251 FCs (74 men and 177 women, mean age 58.5 ± 14.2 years). Most of the participants experienced a substantial caregiving workload related to practical help (89.8%), provided some or a lot of personal care (73.1%), and psychological support (67.7%) to patients. More than half of the FCs reported that the patient's disease caused them negative physical effects (62.7%). Emotional, psychosocial, and psychological needs were referred. Some FCs reported that the patient's disease caused them a lot of stress (57.3%) and that they did not have enough time for friends/acquaintances (69.5%) and family (55.7%). The need to see a psychologist also emerged (44.0%). Age, caregiving duration, and patients' functional status correlated with FCs' unmet needs. Women reported more negative social, physical, and psychological consequences and a more frequent need to talk to a psychologist. Conclusion The analysis demonstrated that cancer caregiving is burdensome.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-021-06655-2

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zavagli, V., Raccichini, M., Ostan, R., Ercolani, G., Franchini, L., Varani, S., & Pannuti, R.
Affiliations
ANT Foundation Italy Onlus (IT)
Corresponding author
Zavagli, Veronica
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2022-01-09
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
3451-3461
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W4205625302
Cited by
24
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
family caregivers, unmet needs, home-based palliative care, cancer caregiving, caregiver burden, caregiver well-being, psychosocial needs, caregiver stress, caregiver support needs, patient functional status, caregiving duration, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Prevalence, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review