Cited by 55Safety Systems Engineering in AutonomyExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Developing artificial neural networks for safety critical systems

Kurd, Zeshan, Kelly, Tim, Austin, Jim·2006·Neural Computing and Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00521-006-0039-9

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurd, Z., Kelly, T., & Austin, J.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Kurd, Zeshan
Venue
Neural Computing and Applications
Published
2006-03-30
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
11-19
ISSN
  • 0941-0643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3058
OpenAlex
W2046353767
Cited by
55
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neural Computing and Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
artificial neural networks, safety-critical systems, safety certification, safety assurance, safety requirements, safety lifecycle, dependability, safety criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review