Cited by 24Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyAnimal Virus Infections StudiesVirology and Viral Diseases

Reassortment among Picobirnaviruses Found in Wolves

Conceição-Neto, Nádia, Mesquita, João Rodrigo, Zeller, Mark, Yinda, Claude Kwe, Álvares, Francisco, Roque, Sara, Petrucci-Fonseca, Francisco, Godinho, Raquel +3 more·2016·Archives of Virology

Abstract

We conducted a viral metagenomics study in diarrheic free-ranging wolves in Portugal, revealing for the first time the presence of reassortant picobirnaviruses. These viruses shared identical capsid segments together with diverse RNA-dependent RNA polymerase segments. Even though causality between these picobirnaviruses and diarrhea could not be established, the study nonetheless confirms for the first time that wolves are a potential reservoir for picobirnaviruses, which might play a role as enteric pathogens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00705-016-2987-4

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Picobirnaviruses are found in humans and other mammals and are thought to be linked with gastroenteritis, but their role in disease remains unclear.

    “Picobirnaviruses are found in humans and other mammals and are thought to be linked with gastroenteritis, however their role in disease remains unclear (Malik et al. 2014; Conceição-Neto et al. 2016).”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Conceição-Neto et al. 2016

  • The picobirnavirus-related transcript found here showed the greatest sequence similarity to a picobirnavirus found in wolves with diarrhoeic symptoms.

    “The picobirnavirus-related transcript found here showed the greatest sequence similarly to a picobirnavirus found in wolves with diarrhoeic symptoms (Conceição-Neto et al. 2016).”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Conceição-Neto et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conceição-Neto, N., Mesquita, J. R., Zeller, M., Yinda, C. K., Álvares, F., Roque, S., Petrucci-Fonseca, F., Godinho, R., Heylen, E., Van Ranst, M., & Matthijnssens, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Rega Institute for Medical Research (BE)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Matthijnssens, Jelle
Venue
Archives of Virology
Published
2016-07-20
Volume
161
Issue
10
Pages
2859-2862
ISSN
  • 0003-9012 (ISSN-L)
  • 0304-8608
  • 1432-8798
OpenAlex
W2478850813
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie
  • KU Leuven
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (IF/00564/2012, SFRH/BD/12291/2003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
viral reassortment, wolf, viral metagenomics, diarrhea, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, viral reservoir, enteric pathogens, wildlife viruses
MeSH terms
Animals, Portugal, RNA Virus Infections, Genetic Variation, Reassortant Viruses, Picobirnavirus, Wolves, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review