Cited by 391Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review of screening instruments for postpartum depression

Boyd, R. C., Le, H. N., Somberg, R.·2005·Archives of Women’s Mental Health

Abstract

This paper presents a review and discussion of eight self-report measures used to assess for depressive symptoms in the postpartum period. Because postpartum depression is a significant mental health problem, there is a need for reliable and valid screening instruments. Published psychometric data (e.g., reliability, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, concurrent validity) of each self-report instrument are presented and critiqued. Results suggest that the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is the most extensively studied measure with postpartum women with moderate psychometric soundness. This review illustrates the need for more research in this area. Issues involved in the selection of measures are considered. Implications for clinical practice, research, culture and language are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-005-0096-6

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. LL Altshuler, 2001, TEN, 3, 48
  2. Field T (1997) The treatment of depressed mothers and their infants. In: Murray EL, Cooper PJ (eds) Postpartum depression and child development. Guilford Press, New York, pp 221–236.
  3. AM Georgiopoulos, 2001, J Fam Prac, 50, 117
  4. Goldberg DP (1972) The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire, vol. 21, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  5. JA Horowitz, 1995, J Perinatol, 16, 268
  6. EM Park, 1995, Psychologia, 38, 199
  7. A Riecher-Rössler, 2003, J Affect Dis, 10, 51
  8. R Uwakwe, 2003, J Affect Dis, 107, 251
  9. VE Whiffen, 1991, J Psychol Neuros, 16, 160

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Boyd, R. C., Le, H. N., & Somberg, R.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Venue
Archives of Women’s Mental Health
Published
2005-09-05
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
141-153
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2017414517
Cited by
390
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r21mh059605-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21 MH59605, R01MH057822, R01 MH57822, K01MH068619)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
postpartum depression, screening tool, self-report measures, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, sensitivity and specificity, concurrent validity, postpartum women, measurement selection
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review