Cited by 28Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumDigital Mental Health InterventionsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Effectiveness of self-help psychological interventions for treating and preventing postpartum depression: a meta-analysis

Lin, Ping-Zhen, Xue, Jiao-Mei, Yang, Bei, Li, Meng, Cao, Feng-Lin·2018·Archives of Women's Mental Health

Abstract

Previous studies have reported different effect sizes for self-help interventions designed to reduce postpartum depression symptoms; therefore, a comprehensive quantitative review of the research was required. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of self-help interventions designed to treat and prevent postpartum depression, and identified nine relevant randomized controlled trials. Differences in depressive symptoms between self-help interventions and control conditions, changes in depressive symptoms following self-help interventions, and differences in postintervention recovery and improvement rates between self-help interventions and control conditions were assessed in separate analyses. In treatment trials, depression scores continued to decrease from baseline to posttreatment and follow-up assessment in treatment subgroups. Changes in treatment subgroups' depression scores from baseline to postintervention assessment were greater relative to those observed in prevention subgroups. Self-help interventions produced larger overall effects on postpartum depression, relative to those observed in control conditions, in posttreatment (Hedges' g = 0.51) and follow-up (Hedges' g = 0.32) assessments; and self-help interventions were significantly more effective, relative to control conditions, in promoting recovery from postpartum depression. Effectiveness in preventing depression did not differ significantly between self-help interventions and control conditions.The findings suggested that self-help interventions designed to treat postpartum depression reduced levels of depressive symptoms effectively and decreased the risk of postpartum depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-018-0835-0

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, P.-Z., Xue, J.-M., Yang, B., Li, M., & Cao, F.-L.
Affiliations
  • Shandong Women’s University (CN)
  • Shandong University (CN)
Venue
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Published
2018-04-04
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
491-503
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2796343528
Cited by
28
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2017MC070)
  • National Social Science Foundation (17BSH054)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
postpartum depression, self-help intervention, depression prevention, depressive symptoms, treatment effectiveness, recovery from depression, postpartum mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Psychotherapy, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review