Cited by 136Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Psychological interventions for major depression in primary care: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials

Bortolotti, Biancamaria, Menchetti, Marco, Bellini, Francesca, Montaguti, Milena Barbara, Berardi, Domenico·2008·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Various studies have tested psychological therapies in the treatment of depression in primary care. Yet, concerns over their clinical effectiveness, as compared to usual general practitioner (GP) care or treatment with antidepressants, have been raised. The present meta-analysis was aimed at assessing currently available evidence on the topic.Method A systematic search of electronic databases identified 10 randomized controlled trials comparing psychological forms of intervention with either usual GP care or antidepressant medication for major depression. Meta-analytical procedures were used to examine the impact of psychological intervention in primary care on depression, as compared to usual GP care and antidepressant treatment.Results The main analyses showed greater effectiveness of psychological intervention over usual GP care in both the short term [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.59 to -0.26, n=408] and long term (SMD=-0.30, 95% CI=-0.45 to -0.14, n=433). The heterogeneity test was not significant in the short term at the P<.05 level (df=5, P=.57, I(2)=0%), but it was significant in the long term (df=5, P=.004, I(2)=70.9%). The comparison between psychological forms of intervention and antidepressant medication yielded no effectiveness differences, for either the short term or the long term.Conclusions Psychological forms of intervention are significantly linked to clinical improvement in depressive symptomatology and may be useful for supplementing usual GP care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.04.001

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bortolotti, B., Menchetti, M., Bellini, F., Montaguti, M. B., & Berardi, D.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Bortolotti, Biancamaria
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
293-302
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033761188
Cited by
136
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
15.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
major depressive disorder, psychological intervention, primary care, antidepressants, treatment effectiveness, depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amitriptyline, Antidepressive Agents, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Counseling, Major Depressive Disorder, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy, Brief, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Fluvoxamine, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review