An inter-laboratory comparison for determination of cortisol in saliva
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Immunoassays have advantages including small sample volumes, high automation, quick turnover, and relatively low cost.
“IAs have advantages such as small sample volumes, high degree of automation, quick turnover times and a relatively low cost, but are often limited by cross-reactivities, matrix effects and high measurement uncertainty at low concentrations [6,7].”
From Salivary cortisol and cortisone in diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: a comparison of six different analytical methods (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Immunoassays are often limited by cross-reactivities, matrix effects, and high measurement uncertainty at low concentrations.
“IAs have advantages such as small sample volumes, high degree of automation, quick turnover times and a relatively low cost, but are often limited by cross-reactivities, matrix effects and high measurement uncertainty at low concentrations [6,7].”
From Salivary cortisol and cortisone in diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: a comparison of six different analytical methods (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
Handbook on metals in clinical and analytical chemistry
Seiler, H. G., Sigel, A., & Sigel, H. (1994) · Marcel Dekker eBooks · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The awakening cortisol response: methodological issues and significance
Clow, A., Thorn, L., Evans, P., & Hucklebridge, F. (2004) · Stress · doi:10.1080/10253890410001667205 · Cited by 856 · see citing works
Long‐term stability of salivary cortisol
Garde, A. H., & Hansen, Å. M. (2005) · Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1080/00365510510025773 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Self-citationHansen, Å. M., Garde, A. H., & Persson, R. (2008) · Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1080/00365510701819127 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citationUtility of salivary cortisol measurements in Cushing's syndrome and adrenal insufficiency
Raff, H. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2009-1166 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Bäcklund, N., Brattsand, G., Lundstedt, S., Aardal, E., Bartuseviciene, I., Berinder, K., Höybye, C., Burman, P., Edén Engström, B., Isaksson, A., et al. (2023) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2023-0141 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garde, A. H., Hansen, �. M., & Nikolajsen, T. B.
- ORCID
- Garde, A. H.
- Venue
- Accreditation and Quality Assurance
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-20
- ISSN
- 0949-1775 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0517
- OpenAlex
- W2046260689
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Accreditation and Quality Assurance (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nordisk Ministerråd
- Multiple Sclerosis International Federation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- cortisol, saliva, interlaboratory comparison, certified reference materials, proficiency testing, measurement uncertainty, recovery, blind samples
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
