Cited by 186Adrenal Hormones and DisordersPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsStress Responses and Cortisol

Utility of salivary cortisol measurements in Cushing's syndrome and adrenal insufficiency

Raff, Hershel·2009·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: The measurement of cortisol in saliva is a simple, reproducible, and reliable test to evaluate the normal and disordered control of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. There are a variety of simple methods to obtain saliva samples without stress, making this a robust test applicable to many different experimental and clinical situations. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Ovid Medline and PubMed from 1950 to present were searched using the following strategies: [ and and ] and [ and and ]. The bibliographies of all relevant citations were evaluated for any additional appropriate citations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Measurement of an elevated late-night (2300 to 2400 h) salivary cortisol has a greater than 90% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of endogenous Cushing's syndrome. Late-night salivary cortisol measurements are also useful to monitor patients for remission and/or recurrence after pituitary surgery for Cushing's disease. Because it is a surrogate for plasma free cortisol, the measurement of salivary cortisol may be useful during an ACTH stimulation test in patients with increased plasma binding protein concentrations due to increased estrogen, or decreased plasma binding protein concentrations during critical illness. Most reference laboratories now offer salivary cortisol testing. CONCLUSIONS: It is expected that the use of the measurement of salivary cortisol will become routine in the evaluation of patients with disorders of the HPA axis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2009-1166

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raff, H.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Raff, Hershel
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2009-10-01
Volume
94
Issue
10
Pages
3647-3655
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2026990065
Cited by
186
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
salivary cortisol, Cushing's syndrome, adrenal insufficiency, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, late-night salivary cortisol, Cushing's disease, pituitary surgery, ACTH stimulation test, plasma cortisol, critical illness
MeSH terms
Adrenal Insufficiency, Circadian Rhythm, Cushing Syndrome, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Saliva, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review