Cited by 236Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesEcology and biodiversity studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Animating the Carbon Cycle

Open access

Abstract

Understanding the biogeochemical processes regulating carbon cycling is central to mitigating atmospheric CO₂ emissions. The role of living organisms has been accounted for, but the focus has traditionally been on contributions of plants and microbes. We develop the case that fully “animating” the carbon cycle requires broader consideration of the functional role of animals in mediating biogeochemical processes and quantification of their effects on carbon storage and exchange among terrestrial and aquatic reservoirs and the atmosphere. To encourage more hypothesis-driven experimental research that quantifies animal effects we discuss the mechanisms by which animals may affect carbon exchanges and storage within and among ecosystems and the atmosphere. We illustrate how those mechanisms lead to multiplier effects whose magnitudes may rival those of more traditional carbon storage and exchange rate estimates currently used in the carbon budget. Many animal species are already directly managed. Thus improved quantitative understanding of their influence on carbon budgets may create opportunity for management and policy to identify and implement new options for mitigating CO₂ release at regional scales.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10021-013-9715-7

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Essington T. 2010. Trophic cascades in open ocean ecosystems. In: Terborgh J, Estes JA, Eds. Trophic cascades. Washington DC: Island Press. p 91–105.
  2. Ritchie ME, Eby SL, Mayemba EP. 2013. Environmental contexts of grazing impacts on soil organic carbon in the Serengeti. PLoS (in review).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schmitz, O. J., Raymond, P. A., Estes, J. A., Kurz, W. A., Holtgrieve, G. W., Ritchie, M. E., Schindler, D. E., Spivak, A. C., Wilson, R. W., Bradford, M. A., Christensen, V., Deegan, L., Smetacek, V., Vanni, M. J., & Wilmers, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Canadian Forest Service (CA)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Marine Biological Laboratory (US)
  • Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE)
  • Miami University (US)
Corresponding author
Schmitz, Oswald J.
Venue
Ecosystems
Published
2013-09-19
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
344-359
ISSN
  • 1432-9840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0629
OpenAlex
W2007742376
Cited by
236
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 11
FWCI
24.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Yale University
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F009364/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/H010041/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
carbon cycle, carbon storage, carbon exchange, terrestrial ecosystems, aquatic ecosystems, atmospheric CO2, carbon balance, multiplier effect, animal management, climate change mitigation policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review