Cited by 25Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFire effects on ecosystems

A Framework to Assess Biogeochemical Response to Ecosystem Disturbance Using Nutrient Partitioning Ratios

Kranabetter, J. Marty, McLauchlan, Kendra K., Enders, Sara K., Fraterrigo, Jennifer M., Higuera, Philip E., Morris, Jesse L., Rastetter, Edward B., Barnes, Rebecca +8 more·2016·Ecosystems

Abstract

Disturbances affect almost all terrestrial ecosystems, but it has been difficult to identify general principles regarding these influences. To improve our understanding of the long-term consequences of disturbance on terrestrial ecosystems, we present a conceptual framework that analyzes disturbances by their biogeochemical impacts. We posit that the ratio of soil and plant nutrient stocks in mature ecosystems represents a characteristic site property. Focusing on nitrogen (N), we hypothesize that this partitioning ratio (soil N: plant N) will undergo a predictable trajectory after disturbance. We investigate the nature of this partitioning ratio with three approaches: (1) nutrient stock data from forested ecosystems in North America, (2) a process-based ecosystem model, and (3) conceptual shifts in site nutrient availability with altered disturbance frequency. Partitioning ratios could be applied to a variety of ecosystems and successional states, allowing for improved temporal scaling of disturbance events. The generally short-term empirical evidence for recovery trajectories of nutrient stocks and partitioning ratios suggests two areas for future research. First, we need to recognize and quantify how disturbance effects can be accreting or depleting, depending on whether their net effect is to increase or decrease ecosystem nutrient stocks. Second, we need to test how altered disturbance frequencies from the present state may be constructive or destructive in their effects on biogeochemical cycling and nutrient availability. Long-term studies, with repeated sampling of soils and vegetation, will be essential in further developing this framework of biogeochemical response to disturbance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10021-015-9934-1

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interactions among pre-fire soil properties, fire severity and post-fire vegetation recovery influence the magnitude of change in soil nutrient pools over time after fire, relative to pre-fire conditions.

    “Furthermore, interactions among pre-fire soil properties, fire severity and post-fire vegetation recovery influence the magnitude of change in soil nutrient pools over time after fire, relative to pre-fire conditions (Godwin et al., 2017;Kranabetter et al., 2016).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Kranabetter et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kranabetter, J. M., McLauchlan, K. K., Enders, S. K., Fraterrigo, J. M., Higuera, P. E., Morris, J. L., Rastetter, E. B., Barnes, R., Buma, B., Gavin, D. G., Gerhart, L. M., Gillson, L., Hietz, P., Mack, M. C., McNeil, B., & Perakis, S.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Forests (CA)
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • Marine Biological Laboratory (US)
  • Colorado College (US)
  • University of Alaska Southeast (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • BOKU University (AT)
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Kranabetter, J. Marty
Venue
Ecosystems
Published
2015-11-18
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
387-395
ISSN
  • 1432-9840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0629
OpenAlex
W2180760441
Cited by
25
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Division of Environmental Biology (0949420, 1145815)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
ecosystem disturbance, biogeochemical responses, soil nitrogen, plant nitrogen, nutrient stocks, disturbance frequency, forest nutrient cycling, ecosystem recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review