Cited by 29Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Inguinal endometriosis, a rare entity of which surgeons should be aware: clinical aspects and long-term follow-up of nine cases

Open access
Wolfhagen, N., Simons, N. E., de Jong, K. H., van Kesteren, P. J. M., Simons, M. P.·2018·Hernia

Abstract

Introduction Inguinal endometriosis is a rare disease and often misdiagnosed for other, more common groin pathology. We present nine cases of women with inguinal endometriosis with long-term follow-up.Methods In this retrospective case series, the Dutch PALGA system was searched for all patients diagnosed with extrapelvic endometriosis located in the groin in the OLVG hospital, Amsterdam, between 2000 and 2016. Relevant information regarding pre- and postoperative characteristics and symptoms was collected. Follow-up consisted of a telephone call from the attending surgeon.Results None of the patients had a history of pelvic endometriosis. Typically, they presented with a right-sided swelling in the groin. Preoperative ultrasound and MRI were in most cases inconclusive. In one of two patients fna indicated endometriosis. In only three patients the surgeon considered the diagnosis endometriosis preoperatively. Surgical removal was effective with no reported complications. A coexisting hernia sac was resected in four cases, and there was a suspicion of a persistent processus vaginalis (canal of Nuck) in three, suggesting that a persistent processus vaginalis is possibly an important key to the pathogenesis. In none of the cases there was an indication for mesh implantation. One patient was later diagnosed with pelvic endometriosis.Conclusion Follow-up by a gynecologist is advised to check for intra-abdominal disease and inform patients on fertility perspective. Surgeons should be aware of the possibility of inguinal endometriosis in fertile women with a lump in the groin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10029-018-1797-x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolfhagen, N., Simons, N. E., de Jong, K. H., van Kesteren, P. J. M., & Simons, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Flevoziekenhuis (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • OLVG (NL)
Corresponding author
Simons, M. P.
Venue
Hernia
Published
2018-08-04
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
881-886
ISSN
  • 1248-9204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1265-4906
OpenAlex
W2885376165
Cited by
29
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hernia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
inguinal endometriosis, extrapelvic endometriosis, groin swelling, processus vaginalis, canal of Nuck, hernia sac, misdiagnosis, surgical excision, long-term follow-up, fertility, pelvic endometriosis, preoperative diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Dysmenorrhea, Endometriosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hernia, Inguinal, Humans, Inguinal Canal, Retrospective Studies, Abdominal Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review