Cited by 30Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Persistence is key: investigating innovative problem solving by Asian elephants using a novel multi-access box

Open access
Jacobson, Sarah L., Puitiza, Amanda, Snyder, Rebecca J., Sheppard, Ashley, Plotnik, Joshua M.·2022·Animal Cognition

Abstract

Innovative problem solving is considered a hallmark measure of behavioral flexibility as it describes behavior by which an animal manipulates its environment in a novel way to reach a goal. Elephants are a highly social taxa that have demonstrated a remarkable capacity for adapting to changing environments. To understand how individual differences in behavior impact expressions of innovation, we used a novel extractive foraging device comprised of three compartments to evaluate innovation in 14 captive Asian elephants. In the first phase of testing, elephants had an opportunity to learn one solution, while the second phase gave them an opportunity to innovate to open two other compartments with different solutions. We measured the behavioral traits of neophilia, persistence, motivation, and exploratory diversity, and hypothesized that higher levels of each would be associated with more success in the second phase. Eight elephants innovated to solve three compartments, three solved two, and two solved only one. Consistent with studies in other species, we found that higher success was associated with greater persistence, but not with any other behavioral traits when analyzed per test session. Greater persistence and, unexpectedly, lower exploratory diversity, were associated with success when analyzed at the level of each individual door. Further work is needed to understand how innovation varies both within and between species, with particular attention to the potential impact of anthropogenic changes in wild environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10071-021-01576-3

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jacobson et al. (2022) found that when Asian elephants were presented with a puzzle box with three push doors in two sessions 2-13 days apart, the latency to solve the first door was shorter in the second compared with the first session, which suggests that elephants likely remembered how to push open the door.

    “In the first phase of the study, when Jacobson et al. (2022) presented Asian elephants with a puzzle box with three of the same door types (three push doors) in two different sessions that were 2-13 days apart, they found that the latency to solve the first door was shorter in the second compared with the first session, which suggests that elephants likely remembered how to push open the door.”
  • Five out of 44 wild elephants who interacted with a novel multiaccess puzzle box solved all three door types, and eight out of 13 captive elephants solved all three door types, which provides evidence that elephants can innovate to find solutions to a novel problem.

    “Five out of 44 wild elephants who interacted with the box solved all three door types (Jacobson et al., 2023), and eight out of 13 captive elephants solved all three door types (Jacobson et al., 2022), which provides evidence that elephants can innovate to find solutions to a novel problem.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobson, S. L., Puitiza, A., Snyder, R. J., Sheppard, A., & Plotnik, J. M.
Affiliations
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
  • Gifford Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
  • Jacobson, Sarah L.
  • Plotnik, Joshua M.
Venue
Animal Cognition
Published
2021-11-28
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
657-669
ISSN
  • 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-9456
OpenAlex
W3181396614
Cited by
30
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • national science foundation (DGE-1646736)
  • rfcuny on behalf of hunter college
  • animal behavior and conservation program, hunter college, cuny
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
innovative problem solving, Asian elephant, behavioral flexibility, persistence, neophilia, motivation, individual differences, extractive foraging, captive elephants
MeSH terms
Animals, Creativity, Elephants, Learning, Motivation, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review