Persistence is key: investigating innovative problem solving by Asian elephants using a novel multi-access box
Open accessAbstract
Innovative problem solving is considered a hallmark measure of behavioral flexibility as it describes behavior by which an animal manipulates its environment in a novel way to reach a goal. Elephants are a highly social taxa that have demonstrated a remarkable capacity for adapting to changing environments. To understand how individual differences in behavior impact expressions of innovation, we used a novel extractive foraging device comprised of three compartments to evaluate innovation in 14 captive Asian elephants. In the first phase of testing, elephants had an opportunity to learn one solution, while the second phase gave them an opportunity to innovate to open two other compartments with different solutions. We measured the behavioral traits of neophilia, persistence, motivation, and exploratory diversity, and hypothesized that higher levels of each would be associated with more success in the second phase. Eight elephants innovated to solve three compartments, three solved two, and two solved only one. Consistent with studies in other species, we found that higher success was associated with greater persistence, but not with any other behavioral traits when analyzed per test session. Greater persistence and, unexpectedly, lower exploratory diversity, were associated with success when analyzed at the level of each individual door. Further work is needed to understand how innovation varies both within and between species, with particular attention to the potential impact of anthropogenic changes in wild environments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jacobson et al. (2022) found that when Asian elephants were presented with a puzzle box with three push doors in two sessions 2-13 days apart, the latency to solve the first door was shorter in the second compared with the first session, which suggests that elephants likely remembered how to push open the door.
“In the first phase of the study, when Jacobson et al. (2022) presented Asian elephants with a puzzle box with three of the same door types (three push doors) in two different sessions that were 2-13 days apart, they found that the latency to solve the first door was shorter in the second compared with the first session, which suggests that elephants likely remembered how to push open the door.”
From Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation (2025) · cites this paper as Jacobson et al., 2022
Five out of 44 wild elephants who interacted with a novel multiaccess puzzle box solved all three door types, and eight out of 13 captive elephants solved all three door types, which provides evidence that elephants can innovate to find solutions to a novel problem.
“Five out of 44 wild elephants who interacted with the box solved all three door types (Jacobson et al., 2023), and eight out of 13 captive elephants solved all three door types (Jacobson et al., 2022), which provides evidence that elephants can innovate to find solutions to a novel problem.”
From Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation (2025) · cites this paper as Jacobson et al., 2022
Cites
Brains, Innovations and Evolution in Birds and Primates
Lefebvre, L., Reader, S. M., & Sol, D. (2004) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000076784 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
Fragmentation of Asia's remaining wildlands: implications for Asian elephant conservation
Leimgruber, P., Gagnon, J. B., Wemmer, C., Kelly, D. S., Songer, M. A., & Selig, E. R. (2003) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1017/s1367943003003421 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
The performance of electric fences as elephant barriers in Amboseli, Kenya
Kioko, J., Muruthi, P., Omondi, P., & Chiyo, P. I. (2008) · South African Journal of Wildlife Research · doi:10.3957/0379-4369-38.1.52 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Detusking Fence-Breaker Elephants as an Approach in Human-Elephant Conflict Mitigation
Mutinda, M., Chenge, G., Gakuya, F., Otiende, M., Omondi, P., Kasiki, S., Soriguer, R. C., & Alasaad, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091749 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Barrett, L. P., & Benson-Amram, S. (2021) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/com0000281 · Cited by 22 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Barrett and Benson-Amram (2021) assessed a number of personality traits potentially related to successful problem solving in both Asian and African elephants and found that aggressiveness and activity (locomotion and exploration behaviors) were important predictors for solving some tasks.”
BackgroundCan Asian Elephants Use Water as a Tool in the Floating Object Task?
Barrett, L. P., & Benson-Amram, S. (2020) · Animal Behavior and Cognition · doi:10.26451/abc.07.03.04.2020 · Cited by 11 · cited 2× · see citing works
“2013; Asian elephants: Barrett and Benson-Amram 2020).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plotnik, J. M., & Jacobson, S. L. (2022) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101148 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationInnovating to solve a novel puzzle: wild Asian elephants vary in their ability to problem solve
Jacobson, S. L., Dechanupong, J., Horpiencharoen, W., Yindee, M., & Plotnik, J. M. (2023) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2023.08.019 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationHope, S. F., Willgohs, K. R., Dittakul, S., & Plotnik, J. M. (2025) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-024-00655-y · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Jacobson, S. L., Puitiza, A., Snyder, R. J., Sheppard, A., & Plotnik, J. M.
- Affiliations
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- City University of New York (US)
- Gifford Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jacobson, Sarah L.
- Plotnik, Joshua M.
- Venue
- Animal Cognition
- Published
- 2021-11-28
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 657-669
- ISSN
- 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-9456
- OpenAlex
- W3181396614
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Animal Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- national science foundation (DGE-1646736)
- rfcuny on behalf of hunter college
- animal behavior and conservation program, hunter college, cuny
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- innovative problem solving, Asian elephant, behavioral flexibility, persistence, neophilia, motivation, individual differences, extractive foraging, captive elephants
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Creativity, Elephants, Learning, Motivation, Problem Solving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review