Cited by 34Primate Behavior and EcologyWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

A “thinking animal” in conflict: studying wild elephant cognition in the shadow of anthropogenic change

Open access
Plotnik, Joshua M, Jacobson, Sarah L·2022·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101148

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In elephant populations, not every animal enters into conflict with humans; there are often 'problem individuals' that regularly engage in negative interactions with humans while a large majority may stay inside a protected area and avoid human contact.

    “not every animal in a given elephant population enters into conflict with humans. Instead, there are often 'problem individuals' (Barrett et al., 2019; Hoare, 2001) that regularly engage in negative interactions with humans while a large majority of elephants within a particular population may stay inside a protected area and avoid human contact (Plotnik & Jacobson, 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plotnik, J. M., & Jacobson, S. L.
Affiliations
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
Corresponding author
  • Plotnik, Joshua M
  • Jacobson, Sarah L
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
46
Pages
101148
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281810251
Cited by
34
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
wild elephants, animal cognition, cognitive flexibility, human impact on wildlife, anthropogenic change, endangered species conservation, comparative cognition, primate cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review